From: Bob Dixon (bob.dixon@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 16 2002 - 10:12:32 GMT-3
I am not stating what is or is not on the lab. However, I would like to
point out that stating that ISO CLNS is not on the lab does not
necessarily mean that IS-IS will not be on the lab. This quote is a
little like some of the lab tasks in that it is easy to make assumptions
and miss small details.
My 2 cents,
-Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Meyer, J. (Johan)" <JohanMe@nedcor.com>
To: "Meyer, J. (Johan)" <JohanMe@nedcor.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: "'Tim O'Brien'" <tobrien@cinci.rr.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:05 AM
Subject: RE: Is there IS-IS in the CIsco LAB
> Please note this is a quote straight from Cisco
> I am not asking for questions related to any topics so I am NOT
breaking any
> rules!!
> For everyone who has internet access this infomation is given
>
> "The following topics have been removed from the lab exam content:
>
> LAT
> DECnet
> Apollo
> Banyan VINES
> ISO CLNS
> XNS
> ATM LANE
> X.25
> Appletalk"
>
> So ISO CLNS has been removed from the LABS??
>
> Can we maybe have some one who works for Cisco and knows this to
confirm.
>
> Best Regards
> Johan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meyer, J. (Johan)
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:04 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Is there IS-IS in the CIsco LAB
>
>
> Please can someone tell me if there is IS-IS in the CCIE LAB
> as Cisco says that there is not but some say there is??
>
> Has anybody actually had a question regarding IS-IS in there CISCO
Lab?
>
> Two attempts allready and there was no IS-IS
>
> Thanks
> Johan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hunt Lee [mailto:huntl@webcentral.com.au]
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:16 AM
> To: 'Gyori Gabor'
> Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Route Reflector /w next-hop-self
>
>
> Hello Gyori,
>
> Thanks so much for the explanation. But in this case, I'm actually
using
> next-hop-self between 2 Route Reflectors (RTA & RTD)?? Is this bad
too??
>
>
> 1.0.0.0/9 --- RTB-| |-RTE --- 3.3.0.0/17
> |--RTA--RTD--|
> 2.0.0.0/10 ---RTC-| |-RTF --- 4.4.4.0/28
>
>
> So RTB & RTC are route reflector clients of RTA &
> RTE & RTF are route reflector clients of RTD
>
> All routers are in the same AS.
>
>
> Thanks!!!
>
> Best Regards,
> Hunt
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gyori Gabor [mailto:Gabor.Gyori@lnx.hu]
> Sent: Saturday, 6 July 2002 11:05 PM
> To: Hunt Lee; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: IOS bug??
>
>
> The route reflector server never changes any BGP attribute on route
that is
> heard from a route reflector client and forwarded to an other client.
> In includes localpref and next-hop, communities, etc.
> It is in order to avoid routing loop.
> So it is a (useful) feature, not a bug.
>
> Gabor
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hunt Lee [mailto:ciscoforme3@yahoo.com.au]
> > Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 2:18 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: IOS bug??
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know if there is a bug on IOS Version 12.0(10)?? I have
> > tried a few other 12.0 images, but there seems to be something wrong
> > with the "neighbor x.x.x.x next-hop self" command.
> >
> > RTD is directly connected to RTA
> >
> > RTA is 172.16.1.3
> > RTD is 172.17.1.3
> >
> > From RTD:
> >
> > router bgp 1
> > no synchronization
> > neighbor 172.16.1.3 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.16.1.3 update-source Loopback0
> > neighbor 172.16.1.3 next-hop-self
> > neighbor 172.17.1.1 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.17.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> > neighbor 172.17.1.1 route-reflector-client
> > neighbor 172.17.1.2 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.17.1.2 update-source Loopback0
> > neighbor 172.17.1.2 route-reflector-client
> >
> > On RTA
> >
> > router bgp 1
> > no synchronization
> > bgp log-neighbor-changes
> > neighbor 172.16.1.1 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.16.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> > neighbor 172.16.1.1 route-reflector-client
> > neighbor 172.16.1.2 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.16.1.2 update-source Loopback0
> > neighbor 172.16.1.2 route-reflector-client
> > neighbor 172.17.1.3 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.17.1.3 next-hop-self
> > no auto-summary
> >
> >
> > But only the routes via RTA has been successfully changed it's
> > Next-Hop, but not the ones via RTD.
> >
> > RouterA#sh ip bgp
> > BGP table version is 3, local router ID is 172.16.1.3
> > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best,
i -
> > internal
> > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
> >
> > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> > *>i1.0.0.0/9 172.16.1.1 0 100 0 i
> > *>i2.0.0.0/10 172.16.1.2 0 100 0 i
> > * i3.3.0.0/17 172.17.1.1 0 100 0 i
> > * i4.4.4.0/28 172.17.1.2 0 100 0 i
> > RouterA#
> >
> >
> > RouterD#sh ip bgp
> > BGP table version is 5, local router ID is 172.17.1.3
> > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best,
i -
> > internal
> > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
> >
> > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> > *>i1.0.0.0/9 172.16.1.3 0 100 0 i
> > *>i2.0.0.0/10 172.16.1.3 0 100 0 i
> > *>i3.3.0.0/17 172.17.1.1 0 100 0 i
> > *>i4.4.4.0/28 172.17.1.2 0 100 0 i
> > RouterD#
> >
> >
> > Please help....
> >
> > H.
> >
> http://www.sold.com.au - SOLD.com.au
> - Find yourself a bargain!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:32 GMT-3