From: Phil (ciscostudent1@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 13:37:35 GMT-3
You can also use Policy Routing.
Oliver Boehmer <oboehmer@cisco.com> escreveu: At 16:43 07.07.2002 -0300, Carl
os G Mendioroz wrote:
>This would change some routing protocol info, but connected routes
>go into the FIB almost directly, so I guess this would not do it.
>
>The reason I'm asking is because some times, I would like a
>router connected to a network to forward the traffic to another router
>and not to its interface.
Hmm, why don't you use the "longest match" rule and create multiple
more-specific statics to the desired next-hop (i.e. two /25 for a /24
connected network)? If you use CEF, you will not be able to prevent traffic
destined to the router's own interface address to follow the statics, but
all the other destinations will do..
oli
>elping wrote:
> >
> > I have not tried this...but how about
> > redistribute connected route-map xxxx
> >
> > Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
> >
> > > Subject says it all...
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos G Mendioroz LW7 EQI Argentina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:22 GMT-3