From: P729 (p729@xxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 01 2002 - 04:29:57 GMT-3
Wayne,
Would you mind trying one more experiment? Try summarizing to a /22 instead
of the major net and see what happens. Just curious...
Regards,
Mas Kato
https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
----- Original Message -----
From: "Baety Wayne SrA 18 CS/SCBX" <Wayne.Baety@kadena.af.mil>
To: "'Lab Candidate'" <labccie@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>;
<irene.golbery@arche.fr>; <louis.krucker@sunrise.net>
Cc: <p729@cox.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 10:28 PM
Subject: RE: rip summary-address
> Of course always test a hypothesis....
>
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 172.17.5.1 255.255.255.0
> ip summary-address rip 172.31.0.0 255.255.0.0
> !
> interface Loopback2
> ip address 172.31.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip address 172.31.3.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
>
> router rip
> version 2
> passive-interface Loopback2
> network 172.17.0.0
> network 172.31.0.0
> no auto-summary
>
>
> RELEVANT DEBUG OUTPUT before ip summary-address rip:
>
> 1w0d: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via Loopback1 (172.17.5.1)
> 1w0d: RIP: build update entries
> 1w0d: 172.31.1.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
> 1w0d: 172.31.3.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
> 1w0d: RIP: Update contains 2 routes
>
> RELEVANT DEBUG OUTPUT after ip summary-address rip:
>
> 1w0d: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via Loopback1 (172.17.5.1)
> 1w0d: RIP: build update entries
> 1w0d: 172.31.0.0/16 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
> 1w0d: RIP: Update contains 1 routes
>
> ...notice that Loopback1 is not on the same major class net as the
> advertised routes.
>
> I think he's simply just using an old IOS version, haven't seen anything
> about this in the Bug Track.
>
> WAYNE A. BAETY, SRA, MCSE, USAF
> 18th Communications Squadron
> DSN: 634-9927
> Commercial: 011 81 611 734 9927
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lab Candidate [mailto:labccie@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:25 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; irene.golbery@arche.fr;
> louis.krucker@sunrise.net
> Cc: p729@cox.net
> Subject: Re: rip summary-address
>
> What Mas said is correct about the restrictions of RIPv2 summary.
> I'm just wonderring what if you want to summarize multiple routes on the
> same interface.
> On CCO, it states that Each route summarization on an interface must have
a
> unique major net,
> whether or not the addresses have unique address masks.
> But how can you keep each route summary with unqiue major net and also
share
> the same major net as
> that of the interface it's summarized on?
> Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> In addition to disabling split horizon, the summary address and the
> interface it is being advertised on must share the same major net.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mas Kato
> https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Krucker, Louis" <louis.krucker@sunrise.net>
> To: "'GOLBERY Irhne '" <irene.golbery@arche.fr>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 9:20 AM
> Subject: RE: rip summary-address
>
>
> > Hello group
> >
> > Heres my config:
> >
> > The goal is to advertse one single route over e0 ( 172.31.0.0 / 16 )
> >
> > This config dont works in my lab, all single routes are advertised over
> > e0, even if i disable split horizon.
> >
> > Please correct me if i am wrong, may i dont get the point and i must use
> > another strategy.
> >
> > int e0
> > ip address 172.17.5.1 255.255.255.0
> > ip summary-address rip 172.31.0.0 255.255.0.0
> >
> > int loopback 1
> > ip address 172.31.2.1 255.255.255.0
> >
> > int loopback 2
> > ip address 172.31.3.1 255.255.255.0
> >
> > router rip
> > version 2
> > no auto-summary
> > network 172.17.0.0
> > network 172.31.0.0
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Louis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: GOLBERY Irhne
> > To: Krucker, Louis; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Sent: 30.06.2002 17:56
> > Subject: RE: rip summary
> >
> >
> > My understanding
> >
> > It is used in Network Access Server context and not for summarisation
> > like
> > we used to do in other routing protocol.
> >
> >
> > Example : 10 remote users connecting to a central router , in order not
> > to
> > have 10 hosts entry in the routing table of the central router you can
> > use
> > this command to summarize and only have a network or subnet entry in the
> > RIB
> >
> >
> > Correct me if i am wrong ?
> >
> > Irene
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Krucker, Louis [mailto:louis.krucker@sunrise.net]
> > Envoyi : dimanche 30 juin 2002 17:13
> > @ : 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Objet : rip summary
> >
> >
> > Hi Group
> >
> > I use rip v2 and no auto-summary, how the command ip rip summary-address
> > will work in this case. I did'nt found a detailed documentation in the
> > archive or at cco.
> >
> > This command does not work in my lab, i try to advertise a summary
> > route.
> > Are there any hints ? Even if i disable split-horizon no summary is
> > advertised. If i look in the rip database the route is there.
> >
> > Thanks for help
> >
> > Louis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:16 GMT-3