From: Shane Miles (smiles@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 20 2002 - 15:49:47 GMT-3
In later IOS versions, can't remember exactly which version it started, IOS
keeps track of when a packet is larger than what is left in the queue so the
next time through the queue it is subtracted so large packet traffic is no
longer such a big consideration.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Pace
To: Shane Miles; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Sent: 6/20/02 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: CQ
I usually round things off in these labs and I see some of the authors
do the same. Does anyone think it is important to take into
consideration the fact that the queing won't fragment a packet meaning
a queue of 1000 bytes and a Data Unit of 900 would really get 1800
bytes on each "round"? Does the CCIE test expect you to research the
MTU's on interfaces and/or apps and protocoles or just use the paacket
sizes and percentages they supply in the question?
Anthony PAce
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 11:29:45 -0400, "Shane Miles" <smiles@ftdata.com>
said:
> If I don't have a byte-count I always use 1500 for lab purposes. So,
> it
> would be:
>
> Telnet--3900 bytes
> FTP--1500 bytes
> IPX--3240 bytes
> DLSW--3240 btyes
> Other--3900 btyes
>
> At least I think that's right. Please point out the errors anyone.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CHIDI FRANCIS
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: 6/20/02 10:14 AM
>
> Hi Members,
> Iam still having a hard time with CQ. Suppose the question says to
> configure
> Queuing as follows
> Telnet--25%
> FTP----10%
> IPX----20
> DLWS---20
> Other--25%
> My question is how do I solve this if I was not given the byte-count
> for
> each
> protocol
>
> Ant help guys
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:39 GMT-3