From: David Luu (wicked01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 20 2002 - 19:16:50 GMT-3
it would be 3072 for the protocol with 512byte packets and 1500 for the
protocol with 1500byte packets
At 09:40 PM 6/20/2002 +0000, Anthony Pace wrote:
>SO if one protocol has 512bytes and needs 50% and another app has 1500
>bytes and needs 25% then go with 3000 and 6000 instead of 3072 and 6144
>for the queues?
>
>Anthony Pace
>
>
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:39:52 -0700, "David Luu"
><wicked01@ix.netcom.com> said:
> > you want to calculate based on the largest data unit
> >
> > At 07:21 PM 6/20/2002 +0000, Anthony Pace wrote:
> > >ok. then it as simple as making the smallest Data Unit the basis for
> > >calculating the Queue size and using percentages to determine how many
> > >multiples of this to sue in createing queue sizes.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 14:49:47 -0400, "Shane Miles" <smiles@ftdata.com>
> > >said:
> > > > In later IOS versions, can't remember exactly which version it started,
> > > > IOS
> > > > keeps track of when a packet is larger than what is left in the queue
> > > > so the
> > > > next time through the queue it is subtracted so large packet traffic is
> > > > no
> > > > longer such a big consideration.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Anthony Pace
> > > > To: Shane Miles; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > > > Sent: 6/20/02 12:58 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: CQ
> > > >
> > > > I usually round things off in these labs and I see some of the authors
> > > > do the same. Does anyone think it is important to take into
> > > > consideration the fact that the queing won't fragment a packet meaning
> > > > a queue of 1000 bytes and a Data Unit of 900 would really get 1800
> > > > bytes on each "round"? Does the CCIE test expect you to research the
> > > > MTU's on interfaces and/or apps and protocoles or just use the paacket
> > > > sizes and percentages they supply in the question?
> > > >
> > > > Anthony PAce
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 11:29:45 -0400, "Shane Miles" <smiles@ftdata.com>
> > > > said:
> > > > > If I don't have a byte-count I always use 1500 for lab
> purposes. So,
> > > > > it
> > > > > would be:
> > > > >
> > > > > Telnet--3900 bytes
> > > > > FTP--1500 bytes
> > > > > IPX--3240 bytes
> > > > > DLSW--3240 btyes
> > > > > Other--3900 btyes
> > > > >
> > > > > At least I think that's right. Please point out the errors anyone.
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: CHIDI FRANCIS
> > > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > Sent: 6/20/02 10:14 AM
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Members,
> > > > > Iam still having a hard time with CQ. Suppose the question says to
> > > > > configure
> > > > > Queuing as follows
> > > > > Telnet--25%
> > > > > FTP----10%
> > > > > IPX----20
> > > > > DLWS---20
> > > > > Other--25%
> > > > > My question is how do I solve this if I was not given the byte-count
> > > > > for
> > > > > each
> > > > > protocol
> > > > >
> > > > > Ant help guys
> > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:39 GMT-3