From: Shane Miles (smiles@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 20 2002 - 17:25:53 GMT-3
Interesting take. I would not have thought of that. I guess it would be
ok unless custom queueing was explicitly requested.
-----Original Message-----
From: atul pawar
To: smiles@ftdata.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 6/20/02 4:09 PM
Subject: RE: CQ
Guyes
If the byte count is not given I think we can use CBWFQ effectively.
In CBWFQ we can calssify each type of traffic and it also gives the
parameter to assign BW Percentwise. Any thoughts about this?
cheers
Atul
e.g
class-map dlsw_traffic
match protocol dlsw
policy-map QOS
class dlsw_traffic
bandwidth percent 20
Interface Serial 0
service-policy output QOS
>From: Shane Miles <smiles@ftdata.com>
>Reply-To: Shane Miles <smiles@ftdata.com>
>To: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: CQ
>Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 14:49:47 -0400
>
>In later IOS versions, can't remember exactly which version it started,
IOS
>keeps track of when a packet is larger than what is left in the queue
so
>the
>next time through the queue it is subtracted so large packet traffic is
no
>longer such a big consideration.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Anthony Pace
>To: Shane Miles; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>Sent: 6/20/02 12:58 PM
>Subject: Re: CQ
>
>I usually round things off in these labs and I see some of the authors
>do the same. Does anyone think it is important to take into
>consideration the fact that the queing won't fragment a packet meaning
>a queue of 1000 bytes and a Data Unit of 900 would really get 1800
>bytes on each "round"? Does the CCIE test expect you to research the
>MTU's on interfaces and/or apps and protocoles or just use the paacket
>sizes and percentages they supply in the question?
>
>Anthony PAce
>
>
>
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 11:29:45 -0400, "Shane Miles" <smiles@ftdata.com>
>said:
> > If I don't have a byte-count I always use 1500 for lab purposes.
So,
> > it
> > would be:
> >
> > Telnet--3900 bytes
> > FTP--1500 bytes
> > IPX--3240 bytes
> > DLSW--3240 btyes
> > Other--3900 btyes
> >
> > At least I think that's right. Please point out the errors anyone.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CHIDI FRANCIS
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Sent: 6/20/02 10:14 AM
> >
> > Hi Members,
> > Iam still having a hard time with CQ. Suppose the question says to
> > configure
> > Queuing as follows
> > Telnet--25%
> > FTP----10%
> > IPX----20
> > DLWS---20
> > Other--25%
> > My question is how do I solve this if I was not given the byte-count
> > for
> > each
> > protocol
> >
> > Ant help guys
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:39 GMT-3