From: Tom Larus (tlarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 12 2002 - 14:07:07 GMT-3
Just to correct any misunderstanding on the part of the casual reader who
might not look at the Cisco tac link, you CAN use DLSW on the same router,
it just won't be doing the translation for you. " Local DLSw between
Ethernet and Token Ring is not supported." is what the article says. You
can then connect all this translational-bridged mess to the remote networks
by DLSW+, which the Cisco article then shows you how to do.
You had me scared there, for a couple of minutes.
----- Original Message -----
From: "MADMAN" <dave@interprise.com>
To: "George Spahl" <g.spahl@insightbb.com>
Cc: <steven.j.nelson@bt.com>; <anthonypace@fastmail.fm>;
<nshah@connect.com.au>; <cash2001@swbell.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: Is SR/TLB on the CCIE lab in any other for besides DLSW+
> Here is the referance, DLSW is not supported when doing translational
> bridging on same router. Makes sense as there is no TCP transport.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/45.html#5
>
> Dave
>
> George Spahl wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> > I hesitate to say this since I couldn't find a reference, but I believe
> > I recently read that DLSW could now be configured to provide the
> > translation between Ethernet and Token Ring on the same box. Anyone
> > tried this or seen a mention of this?
> > George
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > steven.j.nelson@bt.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 5:40 AM
> > To: anthonypace@fastmail.fm; nshah@connect.com.au; cash2001@swbell.net;
> > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: Is SR/TLB on the CCIE lab in any other for besides DLSW+
> >
> > Anthony
> >
> > DLSw does not address SR/TLB issues where there is an Ethernet and a TR
> > interface on the same box, you still have to know how to do this, look
> > up
> > the source bridge transparent command.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anthony Pace [mailto:anthonypace@fastmail.fm]
> > Sent: 10 June 2002 00:25
> > To: Nick Shah; Jason Cash; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Is SR/TLB on the CCIE lab in any other for besides DLSW+
> >
> > It is my understanding that DLSW+ is the current favorite way to glue
> > non-routable traffic between Etherenet and/or Token Ring LANS across
> > various kinds of WANS. DLSW+ , for the most part, takes care of all
> > differences in addressing.
> > Could SR/TLB be on the CCIE test as well, or does DLSW+ make that
> > obsolete?
> >
> > Anthony Pace
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:54:03 +1000, "Nick Shah" <nshah@connect.com.au>
> > said:
> > > Jason,
> > >
> > > I am not particularly referring to Solie or any other lab, but you
> > need
> > > atleast 2 routers with token ring cards, and one of them *must* have
> > > token+ethernet (its good if the other has token+ethernet, otherwise
> > > token
> > > only should be ok). This will enable you to run SRB, SR/TLB
> > > (translational
> > > bridging). Unless of course you work with token ring in your day to
> > day
> > > life, then you can skip it.
> > >
> > > rgds
> > > Nick
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jason Cash" <cash2001@swbell.net>
> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:17 AM
> > > Subject: Token Ring in home lab
> > >
> > >
> > > > I currently have only 2501 routers and a 4500 with 4 serial and 2
> > eth.
> > > > My question is, should I invest in a 2 token card for the 4500? Is
> > it
> > > > feasible to invest in this card (i.e. can I run some of the Solie
> > labs)
> > > > with only one device having TR? I am referring to the bridging
> > DLSW,
> > > > RSRB labs, etc.
> > > >
> > > > Here is the link to the card I am considering:
> > > >
> > > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem
> > > > <http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2029951844>
> > > > &item=2029951844
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:31 GMT-3