From: Nick Shah (nshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 13 2002 - 09:28:22 GMT-3
Steven et al.
Not sure, if I am misreading u.
But wont u need to run SR/TLB if say for example, you got 2 routers one
having token ring & ethernet segments, the other having Ether segment ...
* If token on RtrA needs to talk to token or Ether on RtrB (and vice
versa) --- DLSW takes care of it
* If token on RtrA needs to talk to Ether on RtrA (and vice versa) --- need
to have SR/TLB
I have verified this..and there is a url depicting this scenario..
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/701/45.html#6
(see example 6)
rgds
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: <steven.j.nelson@bt.com>
To: <anthonypace@fastmail.fm>; <nshah@connect.com.au>;
<cash2001@swbell.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:40 PM
Subject: RE: Is SR/TLB on the CCIE lab in any other for besides DLSW+
> Anthony
>
> DLSw does not address SR/TLB issues where there is an Ethernet and a TR
> interface on the same box, you still have to know how to do this, look up
> the source bridge transparent command.
>
> HTH
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Pace [mailto:anthonypace@fastmail.fm]
> Sent: 10 June 2002 00:25
> To: Nick Shah; Jason Cash; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Is SR/TLB on the CCIE lab in any other for besides DLSW+
>
>
> It is my understanding that DLSW+ is the current favorite way to glue
> non-routable traffic between Etherenet and/or Token Ring LANS across
> various kinds of WANS. DLSW+ , for the most part, takes care of all
> differences in addressing.
> Could SR/TLB be on the CCIE test as well, or does DLSW+ make that
> obsolete?
>
> Anthony Pace
>
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:54:03 +1000, "Nick Shah" <nshah@connect.com.au>
> said:
> > Jason,
> >
> > I am not particularly referring to Solie or any other lab, but you need
> > atleast 2 routers with token ring cards, and one of them *must* have
> > token+ethernet (its good if the other has token+ethernet, otherwise
> > token
> > only should be ok). This will enable you to run SRB, SR/TLB
> > (translational
> > bridging). Unless of course you work with token ring in your day to day
> > life, then you can skip it.
> >
> > rgds
> > Nick
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jason Cash" <cash2001@swbell.net>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:17 AM
> > Subject: Token Ring in home lab
> >
> >
> > > I currently have only 2501 routers and a 4500 with 4 serial and 2 eth.
> > > My question is, should I invest in a 2 token card for the 4500? Is it
> > > feasible to invest in this card (i.e. can I run some of the Solie
labs)
> > > with only one device having TR? I am referring to the bridging DLSW,
> > > RSRB labs, etc.
> > >
> > > Here is the link to the card I am considering:
> > >
> > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem
> > > <http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2029951844>
> > > &item=2029951844
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:32 GMT-3