From: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx
Date: Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:16:03 GMT-3
Nick
This example states exactly what I was saying, SR/TLB is made possible by
the source bridge transparent command on RtrA in your example.
This command has nothing to do with DLSW as such, it simply ties the two
transparent bridging domains together, doing all the TR to ethernet stuff
and vice versa. i.e bitswapping, frame size etc ect
HTH
Keep at it
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Shah [mailto:nshah@connect.com.au]
Sent: 13 June 2002 13:28
To: Nelson,SJ,Steven,IVNH33 C; anthonypace; cash2001; ccielab
Subject: Re: Is SR/TLB on the CCIE lab in any other for besides DLSW+
Steven et al.
Not sure, if I am misreading u.
But wont u need to run SR/TLB if say for example, you got 2 routers one
having token ring & ethernet segments, the other having Ether segment ...
* If token on RtrA needs to talk to token or Ether on RtrB (and vice
versa) --- DLSW takes care of it
* If token on RtrA needs to talk to Ether on RtrA (and vice versa) --- need
to have SR/TLB
I have verified this..and there is a url depicting this scenario..
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/701/45.html#6
(see example 6)
rgds
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: <steven.j.nelson@bt.com>
To: <anthonypace@fastmail.fm>; <nshah@connect.com.au>;
<cash2001@swbell.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:40 PM
Subject: RE: Is SR/TLB on the CCIE lab in any other for besides DLSW+
> Anthony
>
> DLSw does not address SR/TLB issues where there is an Ethernet and a TR
> interface on the same box, you still have to know how to do this, look up
> the source bridge transparent command.
>
> HTH
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Pace [mailto:anthonypace@fastmail.fm]
> Sent: 10 June 2002 00:25
> To: Nick Shah; Jason Cash; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Is SR/TLB on the CCIE lab in any other for besides DLSW+
>
>
> It is my understanding that DLSW+ is the current favorite way to glue
> non-routable traffic between Etherenet and/or Token Ring LANS across
> various kinds of WANS. DLSW+ , for the most part, takes care of all
> differences in addressing.
> Could SR/TLB be on the CCIE test as well, or does DLSW+ make that
> obsolete?
>
> Anthony Pace
>
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:54:03 +1000, "Nick Shah" <nshah@connect.com.au>
> said:
> > Jason,
> >
> > I am not particularly referring to Solie or any other lab, but you need
> > atleast 2 routers with token ring cards, and one of them *must* have
> > token+ethernet (its good if the other has token+ethernet, otherwise
> > token
> > only should be ok). This will enable you to run SRB, SR/TLB
> > (translational
> > bridging). Unless of course you work with token ring in your day to day
> > life, then you can skip it.
> >
> > rgds
> > Nick
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jason Cash" <cash2001@swbell.net>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:17 AM
> > Subject: Token Ring in home lab
> >
> >
> > > I currently have only 2501 routers and a 4500 with 4 serial and 2 eth.
> > > My question is, should I invest in a 2 token card for the 4500? Is it
> > > feasible to invest in this card (i.e. can I run some of the Solie
labs)
> > > with only one device having TR? I am referring to the bridging DLSW,
> > > RSRB labs, etc.
> > >
> > > Here is the link to the card I am considering:
> > >
> > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem
> > > <http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2029951844>
> > > &item=2029951844
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:32 GMT-3