From: Michael Popovich (m.popovich@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 06 2002 - 00:23:05 GMT-3
EIGRP auto-summary is off.
MP
----- Original Message -----
From: "mize" <mize@netbuddy.org>
To: "chris@pacinter.net (Martin, Chris)" <chris@pacinter.net (Martin,
Chris)>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: Re: EIGRP Topology Issue
> I think that's the point, turn off EIGRP auto-summary on R1 and everything
will be fine.
>
> >in your route table you have a network statement of 10.0.0.0 for igrp,
igrp
> >has a lower administrative distance then eigrp redistribution, which
would
> >be external with a AD of 170, i beleive that may be the problem, or try
> >clearing the route table, shutting the interface and bringing it back up
> >again...
> >HTH
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Michael Popovich" <m.popovich@mchsi.com>
> >To: "Martin, Chris" <chris@pacinter.net>; "CCIE GROUPSTUDY"
> ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:11 PM
> >Subject: Re: EIGRP Topology Issue
> >
> >
> >> It does have the same mask as IGRP.
> >>
> >> r1----Frame----R2
> >> |
> >> Frame
> >> |
> >> R5
> >>
> >>
> >> 172.150.2.0/24 between R1 and R2
> >> 172.150.1.0/24 between R1 and R5
> >>
> >> Loopback 0=10.2.2.2/24 on R2.
> >>
> >> R1 to R2 is EIGRP
> >> R2 to R5 is IGRP
> >>
> >> Loopback 0 on R2 is redistributed via connected into EIGRP.
> >>
> >> 10.2.2.0/24 shows up in EIGRP topology on R1 but not routing table.
> >>
> >> 10.2.2.0/24 shows up in R5 routing table via IGRP from R1.
> >> EIGRP and IGRP have same AS number so redistribution is happening on
R1.
> >>
> >>
> >> MP
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Martin, Chris" <chris@pacinter.net>
> >> To: "Michael Popovich" <m.popovich@mchsi.com>; "CCIE GROUPSTUDY"
> >> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 5:03 PM
> >> Subject: Re: EIGRP Topology Issue
> >>
> >>
> >> > it looks to me your running IGRP, from what the route table shows,
and i
> >> > would guess your loopback has a mask that doesnt match your outbound
> >> > interface on the router running igrp.
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Michael Popovich" <m.popovich@mchsi.com>
> >> > To: "CCIE GROUPSTUDY" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:21 PM
> >> > Subject: EIGRP Topology Issue
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > I have a virtual-template connecting R1 and R2 over frame. On R2 I
am
> >> > getting
> >> > > all the routes via EIGRP and I am redistributing connected with a
> >> > route-map to
> >> > > limit it to Loopback 0 network. The loopback 0 network on R2
appears
> >in
> >> > the
> >> > > EIGRP topology of R1 but not in the routing table.
> >> > >
> >> > > Any ideas?
> >> > >
> >> > > TIA
> >> > >
> >> > > MP
> >> > >
> >> > > r1#sh ip eigrp topology
> >> > > IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(100)/ID(192.168.100.1)
> >> > >
> >> > > Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
> >> > > r - reply Status, s - sia Status
> >> > >
> >> > > P 10.2.2.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 22688000
> >> > > via 172.150.2.2 (22688000/128256), Virtual-Access1
> >> > > P 10.0.0.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40640000
> >> > > via Redistributed (40640000/0)
> >> > > P 10.1.1.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 128256
> >> > > via Redistributed (128256/0)
> >> > > P 10.20.20.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40512000
> >> > > via Redistributed (40512000/0)
> >> > > P 192.168.100.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 128256
> >> > > via Redistributed (128256/0)
> >> > > P 172.150.8.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40537600
> >> > > via Redistributed (40537600/0)
> >> > > P 172.150.2.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 22560000
> >> > > via Connected, Virtual-Access1
> >> > > P 172.150.2.2/32, 1 successors, FD is 22560000
> >> > > via Rconnected (22560000/0)
> >> > > P 172.150.1.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40512000
> >> > > via Redistributed (40512000/0)
> >> > >
> >> > > R1 routing table:
> >> > >
> >> > > r1#si
> >> > >
> >> > > Gateway of last resort is not set
> >> > >
> >> > > 172.150.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
> >> > > I 172.150.8.0/24 [100/158350] via 172.150.1.5, 00:01:24,
Serial0
> >> > > C 172.150.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0
> >> > > 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 4 subnets
> >> > > I 10.0.0.0 [100/158750] via 172.150.1.5, 00:01:24, Serial0
> >> > > C 10.20.20.0 is directly connected, Serial0
> >> > > C 10.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
> >> > > C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> >> > > C 192.168.100.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:26 GMT-3