From: mize (mize@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 06 2002 - 00:42:34 GMT-3
Did you use physical interface at R2 and R5? Enable 'ip split-horizon' on those
interfaces so that the route 10.2.2.0/24 will not be advertisd back from R2.
>EIGRP auto-summary is off.
>
>MP
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "mize" <mize@netbuddy.org>
>To: "chris@pacinter.net (Martin, Chris)" <chris@pacinter.net (Martin,
>Chris)>
>Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 12:00 AM
>Subject: Re: Re: EIGRP Topology Issue
>
>
>> I think that's the point, turn off EIGRP auto-summary on R1 and everything
>will be fine.
>>
>> >in your route table you have a network statement of 10.0.0.0 for igrp,
>igrp
>> >has a lower administrative distance then eigrp redistribution, which
>would
>> >be external with a AD of 170, i beleive that may be the problem, or try
>> >clearing the route table, shutting the interface and bringing it back up
>> >again...
>> >HTH
>> >
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Michael Popovich" <m.popovich@mchsi.com>
>> >To: "Martin, Chris" <chris@pacinter.net>; "CCIE GROUPSTUDY"
>> ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> >Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:11 PM
>> >Subject: Re: EIGRP Topology Issue
>> >
>> >
>> >> It does have the same mask as IGRP.
>> >>
>> >> r1----Frame----R2
>> >> |
>> >> Frame
>> >> |
>> >> R5
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 172.150.2.0/24 between R1 and R2
>> >> 172.150.1.0/24 between R1 and R5
>> >>
>> >> Loopback 0=10.2.2.2/24 on R2.
>> >>
>> >> R1 to R2 is EIGRP
>> >> R2 to R5 is IGRP
>> >>
>> >> Loopback 0 on R2 is redistributed via connected into EIGRP.
>> >>
>> >> 10.2.2.0/24 shows up in EIGRP topology on R1 but not routing table.
>> >>
>> >> 10.2.2.0/24 shows up in R5 routing table via IGRP from R1.
>> >> EIGRP and IGRP have same AS number so redistribution is happening on
>R1.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> MP
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Martin, Chris" <chris@pacinter.net>
>> >> To: "Michael Popovich" <m.popovich@mchsi.com>; "CCIE GROUPSTUDY"
>> >> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 5:03 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: EIGRP Topology Issue
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > it looks to me your running IGRP, from what the route table shows,
>and i
>> >> > would guess your loopback has a mask that doesnt match your outbound
>> >> > interface on the router running igrp.
>> >> >
>> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > From: "Michael Popovich" <m.popovich@mchsi.com>
>> >> > To: "CCIE GROUPSTUDY" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:21 PM
>> >> > Subject: EIGRP Topology Issue
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > > I have a virtual-template connecting R1 and R2 over frame. On R2 I
>am
>> >> > getting
>> >> > > all the routes via EIGRP and I am redistributing connected with a
>> >> > route-map to
>> >> > > limit it to Loopback 0 network. The loopback 0 network on R2
>appears
>> >in
>> >> > the
>> >> > > EIGRP topology of R1 but not in the routing table.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Any ideas?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > TIA
>> >> > >
>> >> > > MP
>> >> > >
>> >> > > r1#sh ip eigrp topology
>> >> > > IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(100)/ID(192.168.100.1)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
>> >> > > r - reply Status, s - sia Status
>> >> > >
>> >> > > P 10.2.2.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 22688000
>> >> > > via 172.150.2.2 (22688000/128256), Virtual-Access1
>> >> > > P 10.0.0.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40640000
>> >> > > via Redistributed (40640000/0)
>> >> > > P 10.1.1.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 128256
>> >> > > via Redistributed (128256/0)
>> >> > > P 10.20.20.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40512000
>> >> > > via Redistributed (40512000/0)
>> >> > > P 192.168.100.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 128256
>> >> > > via Redistributed (128256/0)
>> >> > > P 172.150.8.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40537600
>> >> > > via Redistributed (40537600/0)
>> >> > > P 172.150.2.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 22560000
>> >> > > via Connected, Virtual-Access1
>> >> > > P 172.150.2.2/32, 1 successors, FD is 22560000
>> >> > > via Rconnected (22560000/0)
>> >> > > P 172.150.1.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40512000
>> >> > > via Redistributed (40512000/0)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > R1 routing table:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > r1#si
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Gateway of last resort is not set
>> >> > >
>> >> > > 172.150.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
>> >> > > I 172.150.8.0/24 [100/158350] via 172.150.1.5, 00:01:24,
>Serial0
>> >> > > C 172.150.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0
>> >> > > 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 4 subnets
>> >> > > I 10.0.0.0 [100/158750] via 172.150.1.5, 00:01:24, Serial0
>> >> > > C 10.20.20.0 is directly connected, Serial0
>> >> > > C 10.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
>> >> > > C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0
>> >> > > C 192.168.100.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:26 GMT-3