From: Michael Popovich (m.popovich@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 05 2002 - 18:21:16 GMT-3
I have a virtual-template connecting R1 and R2 over frame. On R2 I am getting
all the routes via EIGRP and I am redistributing connected with a route-map to
limit it to Loopback 0 network. The loopback 0 network on R2 appears in the
EIGRP topology of R1 but not in the routing table.
Any ideas?
TIA
MP
r1#sh ip eigrp topology
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(100)/ID(192.168.100.1)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 10.2.2.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 22688000
via 172.150.2.2 (22688000/128256), Virtual-Access1
P 10.0.0.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40640000
via Redistributed (40640000/0)
P 10.1.1.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 128256
via Redistributed (128256/0)
P 10.20.20.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40512000
via Redistributed (40512000/0)
P 192.168.100.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 128256
via Redistributed (128256/0)
P 172.150.8.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40537600
via Redistributed (40537600/0)
P 172.150.2.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 22560000
via Connected, Virtual-Access1
P 172.150.2.2/32, 1 successors, FD is 22560000
via Rconnected (22560000/0)
P 172.150.1.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 40512000
via Redistributed (40512000/0)
R1 routing table:
r1#si
Gateway of last resort is not set
172.150.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
I 172.150.8.0/24 [100/158350] via 172.150.1.5, 00:01:24, Serial0
C 172.150.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 4 subnets
I 10.0.0.0 [100/158750] via 172.150.1.5, 00:01:24, Serial0
C 10.20.20.0 is directly connected, Serial0
C 10.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0
C 192.168.100.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:25 GMT-3