From: Paul (p_chopin@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 17:38:48 GMT-3
Thanks, this is really interesting suggustion, but it
won't work in my scenario. How other routers in rip
domain will know about /19 network ?(except for
defalult
route)
Paul
--- Nigel Taylor <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Paul,
> In the past I had a scanerio where this was
> the problem, I came up
> with the use of the "no ip classless" command.
> The key here is that in summarizing the /19 to a
> longer mask. This with the
> "no ip classless" should allow for packets to
> be routed through the network, however when arriving
> on the locally sourced
> router, the packet should remain classfull
> and be routed to the correct segment versus using
> the summary route. Of
> course there are only few circumstances where
> this configuration will make sense, a lab enviroment
> is major one of them
> that comes to mind.
>
> Here's a pretty good link. I know a couple of years
> ago there was a pretty
> active on the list about using the "ip classless"
> command. Check there as well if interested.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html
>
> HTH
>
> Nigel
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul" <p_chopin@yahoo.com>
> To: "Emmanuel Oppong" <e-oppong@attbi.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 2:58 PM
> Subject: RE: Route redistribution
>
>
> > That would be fine.But we are only running rip
> ver1.
> > We all know how to summerize networks with address
> /25
> > /26 and so on in order to redistriburte them to
> > classfull protocols. But how we do that for nets
> /19
> > /20 when when classfull protocol interface has
> biger
> > mask.
> > paul
> > --- Emmanuel Oppong <e-oppong@attbi.com> wrote:
> > > Paul,
> > >
> > > For OSPF-RIP why don't you use "ip rip send
> version
> > > 2 on OSRF router
> > > interface, and "ip rip receive version 2" on
> RIP
> > > router interface?
> > > For OSPF-IGRP why don't you use "ip
> > > default-information originate" or " ip
> > > default-network ..."?
> > >
> > > E
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > Paul
> > > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 1:09 AM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Route redistribution
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi group,
> > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but after
> intensive
> > > testing it seems to me there is no way to
> > > redistribute
> > > ospf route let's say 140.10.0.0/22 into rip or
> igrp
> > > domain over /24 interface of the same majore
> net(
> > > 140.10.1.0/24).Secondary addressing doesn't work
> in
> > > this case. Tunneling might work but is awkward.
> > > Only default route seems to be solution.(which
> is
> > > not
> > > allowed in the lab of course).
> > > I'm taking lab soon, and I'd appreciate any
> ideas
> > > Thank you .
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:10 GMT-3