Re: Anyone Using 827-4V in their Lab? It has four FXS ports built in.

From: Geoff Zinderdine (geoffz@xxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 11:43:45 GMT-3


   
UBR924s work as well as a cheap voice solution, but if you are going to
spend 750 on an 827, consider getting a couple of MC3810s with FXS and
MFT-T1s. I got an outrageously good deal on mine, $850 for the pair and
while there aren't that many deals like that out there, you should be
able to get a couple of them for 1500 at the most. This gives you the
ability to run ATM back-to-back between them and to do VoFR and VoATM in
addition to VoIP. Depending on how much you want to play with voice,
you can load the AVM up with whatever combination of FXS, FXO and E&M
ports that you want. Otherwise, they function like a 2501 with a faster
processor.

Geoff Zinderdine

On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 17:02, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Thinking about getting me a pair of 827-4V's. We have a plain 827 in
> our office, and the IOS seems mostly intact. I mean it runs IOS and
> most of the commands seem to be there. See bottom for sample 827
> config.
>
> They are going for about $750, new on the internet. Which is much
> cheaper than adding voice to a 2600 or a 3600.
>
> Figure I can run the voip traffic out of the Ethernet interface, back to
> back, or thru my other routers.
>
> The DSL/ATM interface would be useless in a home lab, unless you are
> going to use DSL anyway to connect to the internet. Wonder if I could
> get a dsl provider to provide two lines, and by the way, point those atm
> pvc's back at each other.
>
> Side Note - Also wonder if anyone is replacing private T1's with private
> DSL circuits. There's no reason anyone running a ATM cloud couldn't
> transport atm pvc traffic coast to coast, starting at a dsl router and
> ending at a dsl router. By passing the phone company and the internet
> completely, but still have the new cheaper technology.
>
>
> Any chance anyone knows how to do DSL/ATM back to back without a DSLAM?
> It would suck a bit, to have atm interfaces that you couldn't use, in a
> home lab where it could be nice to have atm running.
>
> Maybe Simline could come out with a two port DSL emulator. That would
> be sweet. A pair of 827-4V's that you could do both voip and atm on. I
> sense a business opportunity.
>
>
>
> Anyway, anyone else thinking about using the 827-v4 in their lab to do
> voip?
>
>
>
> http://www.nextag.com/Cisco_827_4V_Adsl~413652z3znzzz1zmainz2-htm
>
>
>
>
> Below is the config that came on our 827 from the DSL provider. I have
> edited out our information.
>
>
> version 12.1
> no service single-slot-reload-enable
> no service pad
> service tcp-keepalives-in
> service timestamps debug uptime
> service timestamps log uptime
> service password-encryption
> !
> hostname asdf
> !
> logging rate-limit console 10 except errors
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> no ip source-route
> no ip finger
> !
> no ip dhcp-client network-discovery
> !
> !
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip adjust-mss 1452
> ip nat inside
> ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
> no cdp enable
> !
> interface ATM0
> no ip address
> no atm ilmi-keepalive
> pvc asdf 1/132
> encapsulation aal5mux ppp dialer
> dialer pool-member 1
> !
> bundle-enable
> dsl operating-mode auto
> !
> interface Dialer1
> ip address negotiated
> ip mtu 1492
> ip nat outside
> encapsulation ppp
> ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
> dialer pool 1
> dialer string adsl
> dialer-group 1
> no cdp enable
> ppp pap sent-username asdf pass 0 changed
> !
> ip classless
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1
> no ip http server
> !
> ip nat inside source list 101 interface Dialer1 overload
> access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
> no cdp run
> !
> line con 0
> exec-timeout 120 0
> transport input none
> stopbits 1
> line vty 0 4
> exec-timeout 0 0
> login
> length 0
> !
> scheduler max-task-time 5000
> end



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:10 GMT-3