From: David Ham (ccieau@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 03:35:23 GMT-3
I don't think Table-map do the trick.
You might have to filter the all the incoming routes before getting into R1
and put the aggregate statement at R1. Only problem is other routers would
think the aggregate route is from R1 as the origin of aggregate route will
bg IGP.
Regards,
David Ham
OPTUS
>From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
>Reply-To: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
>To: Paul <p_chopin@yahoo.com>
>CC: Groupstudy ccielab list <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: BGP aggregation
>Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 11:03:03 -0300
>
>How about using table-map to filter the specifics ?
>
>Paul wrote:
> >
> > Hi guy,
> > Here it is scenario. R1 is getting external routes
> > from other AS. R1 is doing aggregation and sending
> > only aggregate towards internal peers. Question is how
> > to prevent R1 from installing specific routes into its
> > own routing table.It should have only aggregate.
> > Paul
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:09 GMT-3