From: Paul (p_chopin@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 03:39:09 GMT-3
If you filter all incoming routes , how are you going
to create aggreate? You must then use network
statement
I guess
Paul
--- David Ham <ccieau@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think Table-map do the trick.
> You might have to filter the all the incoming routes
> before getting into R1
> and put the aggregate statement at R1. Only problem
> is other routers would
> think the aggregate route is from R1 as the origin
> of aggregate route will
> bg IGP.
>
> Regards,
>
> David Ham
> OPTUS
>
>
> >From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
> >Reply-To: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
> >To: Paul <p_chopin@yahoo.com>
> >CC: Groupstudy ccielab list
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: BGP aggregation
> >Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 11:03:03 -0300
> >
> >How about using table-map to filter the specifics ?
> >
> >Paul wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi guy,
> > > Here it is scenario. R1 is getting external
> routes
> > > from other AS. R1 is doing aggregation and
> sending
> > > only aggregate towards internal peers. Question
> is how
> > > to prevent R1 from installing specific routes
> into its
> > > own routing table.It should have only aggregate.
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:09 GMT-3