Re: Just for a confirmation !! on redistribution

From: Chris Hugo (chrishugo@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 14 2002 - 03:39:09 GMT-3


   
 Hi Mamoor,
The route-map ospf should work fine. Doyle calls it a negative logic route-map
on page 826 to 827 (chapter 14). WOW that was a great book
chris hugo
  Ahmed Mamoor Amimi <mamoor@ieee.org> wrote: Morning Guys !!
Is my way of redistribution correct please confirmed after reading this :

r1------(eigrp)-------r2------(ospf)-------r3

r1 running eigrp
r2 running eigrp and ospf
r3 running ospf

r1 have routes 1,2,3
r3 have routes 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 (lots of routes)

on r2 i will redistribute and be specific that no route loop is formed so i
use route-map in redistribution.

i made a route-map on r2 which only calls eigrp routes
route-map eigrp
match ip address 1

access-list 1 permit 1
access-list 1 permit 2
access-list 1 permit 3

for ospf i dont make access-list but instead i denied 1,2,3 and allow others ,
like :
route-map ospf deny 10
match ip address 1

route-map ospf permit 20

ospf route-map is calling that same access-list that is made for eigrp but
here this access-list is denied and rest are permitted.

Is this the correct way or i should make an access-list for ospf and call
4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 (takes lot of time) and apply it to the ospf
route-map.

Just want to make sure .....

waiting for comments.

-Mamoor



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:56 GMT-3