From: Curtis Phillips (cphillips@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 12 2002 - 09:41:34 GMT-3
Sanjeev,
You are using a multipoint sub-int on the hub right?
Then shoudln't you disable split-horizon for EIGRP process on the
sub-interface?
Curtis
----- Original Message -----
From: "sanjeev" <san_sri@lycosasia.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 10:36 PM
Subject: eigrp config over frame-relay questions
> Hello !
>
>
> *I an connecting r1,r2,r3,r4 across a frame-relay cloud - r1 is the hub
router and is connected to r2,r3,r4 - each of these routers has a
frame-relay config with physical interfaces- r2,r3 ,r4 has a physical map
statement
>
> i need to enable on the frame-relay hub router main serial "no ip
split-horizon..." for this eigrp config.
>
> 1> r2 has two other interfaces with ip address 192.168.88.2/25 and
192.168.88.206/25 and these are included in the eigrp definitions in r2;
do we need to do anything special for these 2 ip addresses to
> appear in the eigrp table of r1,r3 and r4?
>
> 2> when do i use the neighbour statements under eigrp at the spoke routers
r2,r3,r4 and when do we use neighbour statements at r1 ? do all the other
routers have to be defined as a neighbour ?
>
> 3>for igrp what are the rules for split-horizon rules applicable ? i need
to enable on the frame-relay hub router main serial "no ip split-horizon..."
for this eigrp config?
>
>
> many thanks !
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> cOntact @ Lycos <http://contact.lycosasia.com>
> = 20MB for email and filestore + lots of other goodies...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:55 GMT-3