From: David Luu (wicked01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 12 2002 - 00:34:05 GMT-3
>*I an connecting r1,r2,r3,r4 across a frame-relay cloud - r1 is the hub
>router and is connected to r2,r3,r4 - each of these routers has a
>frame-relay config with physical interfaces- r2,r3 ,r4 has a physical map
>statement
>
>i need to enable on the frame-relay hub router main serial "no ip
>split-horizon..." for this eigrp config.
make sure you use the no ip split-horizon eigrp as# ...not to be confused
with the regular expression which is for rip and igrp
>1> r2 has two other interfaces with ip address 192.168.88.2/25 and
>192.168.88.206/25 and these are included in the eigrp definitions in
>r2; do we need to do anything special for these 2 ip addresses to
>appear in the eigrp table of r1,r3 and r4?
as long as you advertised it in eigrp than it should show up, you need to
put the no auto-summary command so that they will show up as /25 instead of /24
>2> when do i use the neighbour statements under eigrp at the spoke routers
>r2,r3,r4 and when do we use neighbour statements at r1 ? do all the
>other routers have to be defined as a neighbour ?
no neighbor statements are needed for eigrp over frame relay
>3>for igrp what are the rules for split-horizon rules applicable ? i need
>to enable on the frame-relay hub router main serial "no ip
>split-horizon..." for this eigrp config?
you still need the no ip split-horizon for igrp in a multipoint setup
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:55 GMT-3