From: Joe Morabito (joe.morabito@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 02 2002 - 21:52:47 GMT-3
I believe that if you are going to use a loopback as an update source, the
neighbor needs some kind of path to that address, whether it be a static or
in the route table.
- Joe (the other one)
----- Original Message -----
From: "peter brown" <pita40@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:01 PM
Subject: BGP update-source
> Hello,
>
> I notice that when I use nei x.x.x.x update-source lo0 on both side of
ibgp
> nei that are directly connected they loose tcp connection with each other.
> When I remove update-source statement from one nei and use the physical
int.
> they are able to establish tcp connection. Why is this the case. Are you
> only suppose to use it only on side between two nei. Below is the config.
>
> Router A
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 40.40.40.4 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
>
> interface Serial0
> ip address 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
>
> router bgp 50
> neighbor 10.1.1.1 remote-as 50
> neighbor 10.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> no auto-summary
>
>
> Router Binterface Loopback0
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
>
> interface Serial0
> ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
>
> router bgp 50
> neighbor 10.1.1.4 remote-as 50
> neighbor 10.1.1.4 update-source Loopback0
> no auto-summary
> no ip mroute-cache
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:49 GMT-3