From: Jason Sinclair (sinclairj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 02 2002 - 21:32:47 GMT-3
Peter,
Are you changing your remote peer statement to the loopback IP address when
you use the loops as the update source?
Regards,
Jason Sinclair CCIE #9100
Manager, Network Control Centre
POWERTEL
Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
SYDNEY NSW 2000
AUSTRALIA
office: + 61 2 8264 3820
mobile: + 61 416 105 858
* sinclairj@powertel.com.au
-----Original Message-----
From: peter brown [mailto:pita40@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 3 May 2002 10:01
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: BGP update-source
Hello,
I notice that when I use nei x.x.x.x update-source lo0 on
both side of ibgp
nei that are directly connected they loose tcp connection
with each other.
When I remove update-source statement from one nei and use
the physical int.
they are able to establish tcp connection. Why is this the
case. Are you
only suppose to use it only on side between two nei. Below
is the config.
Router A
interface Loopback0
ip address 40.40.40.4 255.255.255.0
no ip directed-broadcast
interface Serial0
ip address 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.0
no ip directed-broadcast
router bgp 50
neighbor 10.1.1.1 remote-as 50
neighbor 10.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0
no auto-summary
Router Binterface Loopback0
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
no ip directed-broadcast
interface Serial0
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
no ip directed-broadcast
router bgp 50
neighbor 10.1.1.4 remote-as 50
neighbor 10.1.1.4 update-source Loopback0
no auto-summary
no ip mroute-cache
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:49 GMT-3