From: Babacar Diop (babacard2000@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 18 2002 - 23:52:17 GMT-3
The addresses are the different but is was doing copy
past and did not modify the address for R3.
The interfaces are on the same MAU, so i guess i have
to used the same ring numbers. Problem solved.
Thanks
--- Jason Sinclair <sinclairj@powertel.com.au> wrote:
> Babacar,
>
> I see two issues if these routers are connected to
> the same MAU. You have
> the same address configured on both interfaces. The
> other issue is that the
> same ring number must be used across a local MAU as
> there is no bridge in
> the middle.
>
> Regards.
>
> Jason Sinclair CCIE #9100
> Manager, Network Support Group
> POWERTEL
> Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
> SYDNEY NSW 2000
> AUSTRALIA
> office: + 61 2 8264 3820
> mobile: + 61 416 105 858
> * sinclairj@powertel.com.au
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Babacar Diop [mailto:babacard2000@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, 19 April 2002 12:00
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: DLSw question.
>
> I have configured DLSw on two routers:
>
> R5
> Source-bridge ring-group 100
> interface TokenRing0
> ip address 133.14.33.1 255.255.255.0
> ring-speed 16
> source-bridge 10 1 100
>
> R3
> Source-bridge ring-group 100
> interface TokenRing0
> ip address 133.14.33.1 255.255.255.0
> ring-speed 16
>
> But everytime i applied "source-bridge 20 1 100"
> to
> R3's T0 i get the follwing message on the console:
>
> 00:37:50: %TR-3-BADRNGNUM: Unit 0, ring number
> (20)
> doesn't match established number (10).
> 00:37:50: %LANMGR-4-BADRNGNUM: Ring number
> mismatch on
> TokenRing0, shutting down the interface
> 00:37:52: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface TokenRing0,
> changed state to administratively down
>
> Am i supposed to configure different virtual ring
> numbers?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:12 GMT-3