From: Jason Sinclair (sinclairj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 15 2002 - 21:41:18 GMT-3
Gregg,
POD was originally intended to work with peer groups, however as you have
noted they also work without peer groups. The only time this will not work
is you have some routers configured in a peer group and other not.
Regards,
Jason Sinclair CCIE #9100
Manager, Network Support Group
POWERTEL
Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
SYDNEY NSW 2000
AUSTRALIA
office: + 61 2 8264 3820
mobile: + 61 416 105 858
* sinclairj@powertel.com.au
-----Original Message-----
From: Gregg Malcolm [mailto:greggm@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2002 09:36
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Mix of POD and Dynamic DSLW Peers
I wonder if anyone else has tried something similar to the
following :
Laptop
1----R6-----Dyn------R2---------R9----Dyn------R5----Laptop 2
Group 2 Group
1
R2 is border peer for group 2. R9 is border peer for group
1. R2 and R9 peer
with each other. Both are prom.
R6 has dyn peer to R2
R5 has dyn peer to R9
Connections between R6 to R2 and R5 and R9 come up as dyn
peers. Connection
between R6 and R5 comes up POD.
My question is, other than making the local peer passive or
not making remote
peer promiscuous, is there any config where POD won't work ?
When I first
studied POD, I was under the impression it would only work
between peer groups
(the documentation examples all seem to be related to
groups). Then I learned
that POD would work without groups and I tried this config
believing that it
would also work here. I just want to be sure in case the
question comes up.
Thanks, Gregg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:08 GMT-3