From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:47:31 GMT-3
u will need promiscuous with the client routers..... that is r6 and r5 .
And same config are given by cisco at :
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/config_dlsw_peers.html
hope this help !
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Gregg Malcolm <greggm@sbcglobal.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 4:36 AM
Subject: Mix of POD and Dynamic DSLW Peers
> I wonder if anyone else has tried something similar to the following :
>
> Laptop 1----R6-----Dyn------R2---------R9----Dyn------R5----Laptop 2
> Group 2 Group 1
>
> R2 is border peer for group 2. R9 is border peer for group 1. R2 and R9
peer
> with each other. Both are prom.
> R6 has dyn peer to R2
> R5 has dyn peer to R9
>
> Connections between R6 to R2 and R5 and R9 come up as dyn peers.
Connection
> between R6 and R5 comes up POD.
>
> My question is, other than making the local peer passive or not making
remote
> peer promiscuous, is there any config where POD won't work ? When I first
> studied POD, I was under the impression it would only work between peer
groups
> (the documentation examples all seem to be related to groups). Then I
learned
> that POD would work without groups and I tried this config believing that
it
> would also work here. I just want to be sure in case the question comes
up.
>
> Thanks, Gregg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:08 GMT-3