Re: BGP Configuration Question (Very Long)

From: Gregg Malcolm (greggm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 11 2002 - 03:09:47 GMT-3


   
Manny,

You are right and that's why I didn't post them right off the bat :) I
thought maybe I was forgetting something very simple. I'll clean 'em up and
try again tomorrow.
The real purpose of what I was doing was to make sure I understood local
pref and med across confed's and I added this twist in. Bad idea !!!

Although, in my nightmares, I always dream of stuff like this...

Thanks, Gregg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Manny Gonzalez" <manny@nyp.org>
To: "Gregg Malcolm" <greggm@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: BGP Configuration Question (Very Long)

> Whoa! That is a complex setup... not as simple as you first made it out
> to be. I suggest that you try and make it strictly BGP to test first...
> no IGP... Have you tried that? Then add complexity? Man, how do you keep
> track of all that stuff? :-))



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:05 GMT-3