From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 06 2002 - 20:36:17 GMT-3
If u have mailed us then u should have access to internet, Please check out
these :
have a look at this paper for root bridge :
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_6_3/config/s
pantree.htm
And this for DLSW :
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/config_dlsw_peers.html
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Narvaez, Pablo <Pablo.Narvaez@getronics.com>
To: Larry Whitfill <whitfill@cox.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 3:06 AM
Subject: RE: Lab Tomorrow! Need Help
> Hello Larry,
>
> 1. If you set "Priority 0" will cause that Cat to become root for ALL
VLANs. You can also use "set spantree root <vlan>" where <vlan> is the vlan
number you want this switch to be root. Remember the lower the priority the
better the chance to become root.
>
> set spantree root 1,2,3 ... this will make this switch become root for
VLAN 1,2,3 ONLY .... if another switch has lower priority than yours for
VLAN4, that switch will still be root for that VLAN.
>
> You can also use some other parameters like root guard to assure any other
switch has lower priority than yours and stuff.
>
>
> 2. If you want to configure on-demand peers, you need to keyword
promiscous on all routers being part of that group:
>
>
> R1
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 promiscuos group 1 border
>
> R2
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.2 promiscuos group 1
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 1.1.1.1
>
> hope this helps!!
>
> cheers,
>
> hockito
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Whitfill [mailto:whitfill@cox.net]
> Sent: Domingo, 07 de Abril de 2002 04:43 p.m.
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Lab Tomorrow! Need Help
>
>
> Hello fellow CCIE waqnnabes and accomplished CCIEs!
>
> I'm sittingin my hotel 13 hours from ground zero and needed some
> clarification and help.
>
> 1. When one wants to ensure that his switch does not become root under any
> circumstance does he set the bridge priority to 0, does he set the
priority
> to the highest possible value, or does he do someting entirely different.
> This has been kicked around quite a bit, but I never found a difinitive
> answer here or on CCO, books, etc., and don't have two CATs to test.
>
> 2. When using DLSW+ peer-on-demand, do I also have to configure a border
> peer, use the promiscuous keyword, both or neither?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Larry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:59 GMT-3