From: Manny Gonzalez (manny@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 30 2002 - 16:19:30 GMT-3
TOPIC CHANGED
Quote from a proctor:
"We are dying to put in a real Routing [AND] Switching device. The 6500
with MSFC2/SUPII is surely the next device to find a place the pod's"
"Lupi, Guy" wrote:
>
> Just a little something to add to this, Cisco has already stated that the
> lab will be getting rid of token ring and adding more real world scenarios,
> I confirmed this in an email to the program. They didn't say when, but I
> would bet it will be very soon with the EOL of the 3920 and 5000/5500, who
> knows what they will put on their next? IPV6, MPLS (maybe there now?), more
> hardware (6500, 7200, 7500). Just a thought.
>
> ~-----Original Message-----
> ~From: Eric Lemmons [mailto:ericlemmons@yahoo.com]
> ~Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 10:59 AM
> ~To: Chua, Parry; Giveortake@aol.com; aquiggle@nc.rr.com;
> ~ccielab@groupstudy.com
> ~Subject: RE: CCIE #9049
> ~
> ~
> ~Every CCIE lab test goes through a "life-cycle". A new test lowers
> ~the passing rate dramatically, over time the passing rate creeps up.
> ~I think one of the lessons to take from this, is that a major change
> ~in the test is probably due this year.
> ~Timing can be an important issue in passing.
> ~Eric
> ~
> ~--- "Chua, Parry" <Parry.Chua@compaq.com> wrote:
> ~> Why not think in positive way, people are learn more from mistake,
> ~> people are work harder, people are able to get more right infor
> ~> from various sources....
> ~>
> ~> > Parry Chua
> ~> >
> ~> >
> ~>
> ~>
> ~> -----Original Message-----
> ~> From: Giveortake@aol.com [mailto:Giveortake@aol.com]
> ~> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 11:56 AM
> ~> To: aquiggle@nc.rr.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> ~> Subject: Re: CCIE #9049
> ~>
> ~>
> ~> Congratulations.... Has anyone else noticed that the tone of
> ~> this board
> ~> has changed dramatically from "failing" to largley "passing"???
> ~> I have
> ~> been watching for about six months. The tone has definately
> ~> changed.
> ~>
> ~> So the question is: Has the tone changed because the 1 day lab
> ~> is not so
> ~> new anymore, or did the tone change because the standards have been
> ~> relaxed a
> ~> little??
> ~>
> ~> Just thourght it was worth bringing up.....
> ~>
> ~> David
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:26 GMT-3