RE: SPIDS

From: Phil (ciscostudent1@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 23 2002 - 11:02:52 GMT-3


   
Please be advised that I'm running version 12.0(7)T on a 2600 series and althou
gh it says "spid NOT valid" (it's a bug in IOS) ISDN works fine.

Phil

  Jim Newton <jnewton@InternetNOC.com> escreveu: John is right. To verify that
you entered them right, after you enter them
and no shut the interface (make sure you enter them before you no shut the
interface) type in sho isdn stat.

You should see something like this:

att-madison-r1#sho isdn stat
Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni
ISDN BRI0/0 interface
dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni
Layer 1 Status:
ACTIVE
Layer 2 Status:
TEI = 122, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED
TEI = 123, Ces = 2, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED
TEI 122, ces = 1, state = 5(init)
spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 sent, spid1 valid
Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 1, tid = 1
TEI 123, ces = 2, state = 6(not initialized)
spid2 configured, no LDN, spid2 sent, spid2 NOT valid
Layer 3 Status:
0 Active Layer 3 Call(s)
Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0
The Free Channel Mask: 0x80000003
Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0

I entered spid1 correctly and spid2 wrong. You can see that is says one is
valid and two is not. Look for both being valid and you know you are OK.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of John
Neiberger
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:50 PM
To: Zakir A; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: SPIDS

If you're given spids for R2, then you put them on R2. The
spids have nothing to do with the destination you're calling.
They are identifiers used between the router and the ISDN
switch.

HTH,
John

---- On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Zakir A (procket1@pacbell.net) wrote:

> When a lab gives me spid numbers for R2, do I put them on R2
or R1?
> I know that if they gave me strings, I would use the OTHER
routers
> string on
> my dialer map.
> However, I do not know what to do with spids...and don't have
the money
> to
> waste to find out.
>
> Thanks.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:19 GMT-3