From: Jack S (prospectccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 03:44:04 GMT-3
Hi Parry,
It worked with multiring on R2. Thankyou very much.
Looks like broadcast mesgs are not sent over SR/TLB.
R1 & R3 are not able to form OSPF neighbor
relationship. Is this the right behaviour?
Thanks,
Jack
--- "Chua, Parry" <Parry.Chua@compaq.com> wrote:
> Subject: RE: SR/TLB issue
> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 11:55:01 +0800
> From: "Chua, Parry" <Parry.Chua@compaq.com>
> To: "Jack S" <prospectccie@yahoo.com>,
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>
> You need multiring on R3 token ring as it is
> connected to a SRB domain.
> I don't think you need multiring on R2 as it is only
> a bridge. "no ip routing " on R2 as well.
>
> Parry Chua
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack S [mailto:prospectccie@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:52 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: SR/TLB issue
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to do SR/TLB in a simple 3 router setup
> -
>
> .1 .2
> R1----eth---R2----to----R3
> netw: 192.168.1.0/24
>
> I configured R1 & R3's interfaces with ip addresses
> and bridged everything on R2 using SR/TLB. But, for
> some reason, R1 couldn't ping R3. Here are the
> configs
> on R2-
>
> source-bridge ring-group 1000
> source-bridge transparent 1000 1111 1 1
> !
> interface Ethernet0/1
> no ip address
> no ip route-cache
> bridge-group 1
> !
> interface TokenRing3/0
> no ip address
> no ip route-cache
> ring-speed 16
> multiring all
> source-bridge 5 1 1000
> !
> bridge 1 protocol ieee
> bridge 1 bitswap-layer3-addresses
>
>
> Am I missing something here? Any insights/ideas are
> appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Jack
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:15 GMT-3