From: Sandro Ciffali (sandyccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 00:46:13 GMT-3
I actualy replied to this post privatly, But now that
i have simulated this in the lab i am replying this to
the group. I don't think (i have tested this)
redistribute connected under eigrp requires metric
specified. If you are redistributing connected
networks, Eigrp process knows about the bandwidth and
delay parameter of that network from the attached
interface and hence uses the delay and bandwidth of
the interface the network is connected and generates
the metric.
I tested this on 12.2, I am sure it has to work on
older ios also.
Sandro
--- Sundar Palaniappan
<sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Redistribute connected" with the metric for the
> under EIGRP resolved the
> problem. I see a route on Router A and I can ping
> the ethernet of Router B.
>
> Here is why, "redistribute connected" doesn't work
> without the metric. I am
> quoting from page 715 of Doyle's book.
>
> The 0 metric is incompatible with the RIP,IGRP and
> EIGRP. These three
> protocols must have the appropriate metrics assigned
> to any redistributed
> routes, or redistribution will not work.
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Ling Ling Liang" <potatomato@rogers.com>
> >To: "Sundar Palaniappan"
> <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>,
> ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: Redistribute connected Question
> >Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:49:09 -0500
> >
> >Hi, there,
> >
> > Can you try to assign metric to the
> redistributed routes?
> >
> > 'redistribute connected metric 1500 100 255 1
> 1500'
> >
> >Regards!
> >
> >LL
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Sundar Palaniappan"
> <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:54 PM
> >Subject: Redistribute connected Question
> >
> >
> > > There are two routers running EIGRP in a
> hub-and-spoke topology with a
> > > frame-relay connection between them.
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is the configuration:
> > >
> > > Router A:
> > >
> > > interface serial0.2
> > > ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.252
> > >
> > > router eigrp 200
> > > network 192.168.10.0
> > > no auto-summary
> > >
> > >
> > > Router B:
> > >
> > > interface e0
> > > ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.0.0
> > >
> > > interface serial0.1
> > > ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.252
> > >
> > > router eigrp 200
> > > network 192.168.10.0 (serial0.1)
> > > redistribute connected
> > > no auto-summary
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > EIGRP neighbor relationship is established. With
> this setup, I am
> >thinking
> >I
> > > should be able to ping the ethernet interface of
> Router B but I can't.
> > >
> > > I checked the route table on Router A and I
> don't see a route to
> >172.16.0.0
> > > subnet.
> > >
> > > When I removed "redistribute connected" and put
> the network statement
> > > (172.16.0.0) under the EIGRP process on Router B
> and it WORKS.
> > >
> > > Just curious to know why "redistribute
> connected" doesn't work.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sundar
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:04 GMT-3