From: Sundar Palaniappan (sundar_palaniappan@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 02:25:22 GMT-3
Sandro,
I tested it on routers running 12.1(2)T. It didn't work when the connected
routes were redistributed into EIGRP without the metric. However, when I
added the metric to the connected routes, it was working.
--Sundar
>From: Sandro Ciffali <sandyccie@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: Sandro Ciffali <sandyccie@yahoo.com>
>To: Sundar Palaniappan <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>,
>potatomato@rogers.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Redistribute connected Question
>Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:46:13 -0800 (PST)
>
>I actualy replied to this post privatly, But now that
>i have simulated this in the lab i am replying this to
>the group. I don't think (i have tested this)
>redistribute connected under eigrp requires metric
>specified. If you are redistributing connected
>networks, Eigrp process knows about the bandwidth and
>delay parameter of that network from the attached
>interface and hence uses the delay and bandwidth of
>the interface the network is connected and generates
>the metric.
>I tested this on 12.2, I am sure it has to work on
>older ios also.
>Sandro
>--- Sundar Palaniappan
><sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > "Redistribute connected" with the metric for the
> > under EIGRP resolved the
> > problem. I see a route on Router A and I can ping
> > the ethernet of Router B.
> >
> > Here is why, "redistribute connected" doesn't work
> > without the metric. I am
> > quoting from page 715 of Doyle's book.
> >
> > The 0 metric is incompatible with the RIP,IGRP and
> > EIGRP. These three
> > protocols must have the appropriate metrics assigned
> > to any redistributed
> > routes, or redistribution will not work.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "Ling Ling Liang" <potatomato@rogers.com>
> > >To: "Sundar Palaniappan"
> > <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>,
> > ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Subject: Re: Redistribute connected Question
> > >Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:49:09 -0500
> > >
> > >Hi, there,
> > >
> > > Can you try to assign metric to the
> > redistributed routes?
> > >
> > > 'redistribute connected metric 1500 100 255 1
> > 1500'
> > >
> > >Regards!
> > >
> > >LL
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Sundar Palaniappan"
> > <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>
> > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:54 PM
> > >Subject: Redistribute connected Question
> > >
> > >
> > > > There are two routers running EIGRP in a
> > hub-and-spoke topology with a
> > > > frame-relay connection between them.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Here is the configuration:
> > > >
> > > > Router A:
> > > >
> > > > interface serial0.2
> > > > ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.252
> > > >
> > > > router eigrp 200
> > > > network 192.168.10.0
> > > > no auto-summary
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Router B:
> > > >
> > > > interface e0
> > > > ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.0.0
> > > >
> > > > interface serial0.1
> > > > ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.252
> > > >
> > > > router eigrp 200
> > > > network 192.168.10.0 (serial0.1)
> > > > redistribute connected
> > > > no auto-summary
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > EIGRP neighbor relationship is established. With
> > this setup, I am
> > >thinking
> > >I
> > > > should be able to ping the ethernet interface of
> > Router B but I can't.
> > > >
> > > > I checked the route table on Router A and I
> > don't see a route to
> > >172.16.0.0
> > > > subnet.
> > > >
> > > > When I removed "redistribute connected" and put
> > the network statement
> > > > (172.16.0.0) under the EIGRP process on Router B
> > and it WORKS.
> > > >
> > > > Just curious to know why "redistribute
> > connected" doesn't work.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Sundar
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:04 GMT-3