From: Sandro Ciffali (sandyccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 02:47:17 GMT-3
I don't have 21.1.2T, But i have 12.1.9 I will try on
12.1.9 and let you know if i find something else..
Thanks
Sandro
--- Sundar Palaniappan
<sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Sandro,
>
> I tested it on routers running 12.1(2)T. It didn't
> work when the connected
> routes were redistributed into EIGRP without the
> metric. However, when I
> added the metric to the connected routes, it was
> working.
>
> --Sundar
>
>
> >From: Sandro Ciffali <sandyccie@yahoo.com>
> >Reply-To: Sandro Ciffali <sandyccie@yahoo.com>
> >To: Sundar Palaniappan
> <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>,
> >potatomato@rogers.com,
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: Redistribute connected Question
> >Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:46:13 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >I actualy replied to this post privatly, But now
> that
> >i have simulated this in the lab i am replying this
> to
> >the group. I don't think (i have tested this)
> >redistribute connected under eigrp requires metric
> >specified. If you are redistributing connected
> >networks, Eigrp process knows about the bandwidth
> and
> >delay parameter of that network from the attached
> >interface and hence uses the delay and bandwidth of
> >the interface the network is connected and
> generates
> >the metric.
> >I tested this on 12.2, I am sure it has to work on
> >older ios also.
> >Sandro
> >--- Sundar Palaniappan
> ><sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > "Redistribute connected" with the metric for the
> > > under EIGRP resolved the
> > > problem. I see a route on Router A and I can
> ping
> > > the ethernet of Router B.
> > >
> > > Here is why, "redistribute connected" doesn't
> work
> > > without the metric. I am
> > > quoting from page 715 of Doyle's book.
> > >
> > > The 0 metric is incompatible with the RIP,IGRP
> and
> > > EIGRP. These three
> > > protocols must have the appropriate metrics
> assigned
> > > to any redistributed
> > > routes, or redistribution will not work.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Ling Ling Liang" <potatomato@rogers.com>
> > > >To: "Sundar Palaniappan"
> > > <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>,
> > > ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Subject: Re: Redistribute connected Question
> > > >Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:49:09 -0500
> > > >
> > > >Hi, there,
> > > >
> > > > Can you try to assign metric to the
> > > redistributed routes?
> > > >
> > > > 'redistribute connected metric 1500 100
> 255 1
> > > 1500'
> > > >
> > > >Regards!
> > > >
> > > >LL
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Sundar Palaniappan"
> > > <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>
> > > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:54 PM
> > > >Subject: Redistribute connected Question
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > There are two routers running EIGRP in a
> > > hub-and-spoke topology with a
> > > > > frame-relay connection between them.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is the configuration:
> > > > >
> > > > > Router A:
> > > > >
> > > > > interface serial0.2
> > > > > ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.252
> > > > >
> > > > > router eigrp 200
> > > > > network 192.168.10.0
> > > > > no auto-summary
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Router B:
> > > > >
> > > > > interface e0
> > > > > ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.0.0
> > > > >
> > > > > interface serial0.1
> > > > > ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.252
> > > > >
> > > > > router eigrp 200
> > > > > network 192.168.10.0 (serial0.1)
> > > > > redistribute connected
> > > > > no auto-summary
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > EIGRP neighbor relationship is established.
> With
> > > this setup, I am
> > > >thinking
> > > >I
> > > > > should be able to ping the ethernet
> interface of
> > > Router B but I can't.
> > > > >
> > > > > I checked the route table on Router A and I
> > > don't see a route to
> > > >172.16.0.0
> > > > > subnet.
> > > > >
> > > > > When I removed "redistribute connected" and
> put
> > > the network statement
> > > > > (172.16.0.0) under the EIGRP process on
> Router B
> > > and it WORKS.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just curious to know why "redistribute
> > > connected" doesn't work.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Sundar
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:04 GMT-3