From: Stephen Oliver (stevie_oliver@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Mar 13 2002 - 06:08:15 GMT-3
Further to my last mail on the extra port numbers not being matched in the
access-list. It seems ports 1981-83 are only used with rif-passthru
So I suppose you can omit these sections of the access-list if you don't use
this.
Stephen.
>From: "JeffSzeto" <jytszeto@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "JeffSzeto" <jytszeto@hotmail.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: Custom Q list
>Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:29:52 +0800
>
>Hi,
>
>I search the CD and found that the dlsw keyword is used in direct encap.
>So,is it mean that if the serial interface is using direct encap, the list
>post by Nic will work?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Jeff
>
>Hi Nic,
>
>Hmmm..., I see how you're trying to grab dlsw first and put it into queue
>3.
>I've never tried it that way.
>
>I 've used this config from a commercial lab for dlsw and queueing and it
>has worked:
>
>queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 list 101
>queue-list 1 protocol ip 2
>queue-list 1 protocol ipx 3
>queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 2048
>queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 1024
>queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 1024
>
>acl 101 permit tcp any eq 2062 any
>acl 101 permit tcp any any eq 2065
>acl 101 permit tcp any any eq 2067
>acl 101 permit tcp any any eq 1981
>acl 101 permit tcp any any eq 1982
>acl 101 permit tcp any any eq 1983
>
>HTH,
>Sean
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Nicolai Gersbo Solling" <nicolai@cisco.com>
>To: "CCIE Lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:51 AM
>Subject: Custom Q list
>
>
>Hi there!
>
>I have the followingf queue list configured:
>
>queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 3
>queue-list 1 protocol ip 1
>queue-list 1 protocol ipx 2
>queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 1150
>queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 2300
>queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 2296
>
>this is apllied to my serial 0:1 interface - I see the IP and IPX packets
>beeing put in the right queue, but the DLSW queue never get's used!
>
>My DLSW configuration is working fine , henci I have some windows 95
>machines broadcasting their netbios names on the network, which is beeing
>seen under DLSW reachability on the remote DLSW peer!
>
>Any ideas?
>
>
>Nic
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:03 GMT-3