From: Tshon (tshon@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Mar 12 2002 - 17:05:33 GMT-3
You could also just add the network and passive interface command under
your IGP
kenairs wrote:
>Hi ,
>So in others words, aparting from redistribute into IGP , RR will only works
>if you have turn off syn.
>Am i correct ?
>
>Or is there any other way beside redistributing to IGP ?
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Sandro Ciffali <sandyccie@yahoo.com>
>To: kenairs <kenairs@hotmail.com>
>Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:38 AM
>Subject: Re: BGP RR
>
>
>>Since you have sync on, Network advertize by R2 on bgp
>>will go into R1's routing table only if it is recd.
>>both on BGP and IGP, Only then R1 will advertize that
>>network to R3.
>>If you turn off the sync on R1 then you will see it
>>being advertized to R3.
>>Or else redistribute the ethernet on R2 into your
>>igrp.
>>
>>Sandro
>>--- kenairs <kenairs@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi ,
>>>From the Cisco CD , is states the below
>>>
>>>When the route reflector receives an advertised
>>>route, depending on the
>>>neighbor, it does the following:
>>>
>>>
>>> a.. A route from an external BGP speaker is
>>>advertised to all clients and
>>>nonclient peers.
>>>
>>>
>>> b.. A route from a nonclient peer is advertised to
>>>all clients.
>>>
>>>
>>> c.. A route from a client is advertised to all
>>>clients and nonclient peers.
>>>Hence, the clients need not be fully meshed.
>>>Here is my topology,
>>>
>>> R1
>>> | |
>>> | |
>>> | |
>>> R2 R3
>>>
>>>All routers are able to reach each other through IGP
>>>( eigrp ) . R1 is the RR
>>>R2 and R3 is the client.
>>>
>>>Now, R2 has a E0 . It then have a network command
>>>under BGP and is propagrate
>>>to R1.
>>>But R1 does not advertised the route to R3 ..
>>>Why is this so ?
>>>All routers are syn enabled.
>>>
>>>
>>> but is R2 received a route from another AS, the
>>>route will be advertised to
>>>R3.
>>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:02 GMT-3