From: Manny Gonzalez (gonzalu@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 10 2002 - 01:41:18 GMT-3
Very true. That is why I also stated that you can do inverse arp. but in
the lab, you might as well nail it in and be sure ... I just don't like
the routers doing their own thing if you know what I mean :-)
edgar feliz wrote:
>
> The problem with mapping, unless it is required is that if you have alot of
remote site going to a hub you have a lot of entrys to configure.
> EF
> Manny Gonzalez <gonzalu@nyp.org> wrote: Well, in using the PVC command (the
new format as it is called) you
> still need to map layer 3 to the pvc
>
> Int ATM3/0
> pvc 0/500
> protocol ip 1.2.3.4 broadcast
> encapsulation aal5snap
>
> You can also use inverse arp, although I highly recommend locking it in
> with a mapping. I personally like the new way much better. it is very
> intuitive and it is also a little more powerful/flexible in my opinion.
> It is the only way to do ubr+ I believe.
>
> Nirav Kumar wrote:
> >
> > hi !
> > conventionally i have configured atm pvc config using
> > the map-list/map-group commands ;
> > reading the in 11.3.t ios doc , u may just use the pvc
> > command ie:
> >
> > interface atm0.44 mulipoint
> > pvc 0/44
> >
> > can anyone has any experience of using the pvc command
> > as captioned above?
> >
> > would appreciate any feedback as to when is it
> > suitable to use the map-group/map-list and when to we
> > use the pvc commands.
> >
> > tia
> >
> > Nirav Kumar
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:58 GMT-3