Re: DLSW issue

From: Lionel Florit (lflorit@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Mar 06 2002 - 02:31:21 GMT-3


   
Jason,

DLSw direct will have DLSw encapsulated directly over frame relay or
hdlc. It's only supported on token ring to token ring connections. All
keep alive go through end to end. it's not a reliable transport. Queuing is
also problem

DLSw Lite rides over LLC2 as you mentioned. It provides reliable transport
and is not limited to token ring to token ring connections (also supports
ethernet, SDLC, QLLC end systems)

configuration of both is very similar except you omit the "pass-through"
keyword for DLSw lite.

Lionel

At 11:44 AM 3/6/2002 +1100, Jason Sinclair wrote:
>All,
>
>Can someone please explain what defines the difference between DLSW Direct
>encaps and DLSW lite. I believe that DIRECT is where you use DLSW as the
>transport and thus need pass-thru and the statement frame-relay map dlsw
>dlci. Whereas with lite you use frame-map llc2 dlci and do not use
>pass-thru. I am having problems with direct with pass-thru and have raised a
>TAC case.
>
>Any ideas?
>
>Jason Sinclair
>Manager, Network Support Group
>POWERTEL
>Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
>SYDNEY NSW 2000
>AUSTRALIA
>office: + 61 2 8264 3820
>mobile: + 61 416 105 858
>* sinclairj@powertel.com.au
>
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>PowerTel Limited, winners of
>Broadband Wholesale Carrier of the year, CommsWorld Telecomms Awards 2001
>Best Emerging Telco, Australian Telecom Awards 2001
>
>**********************************************************************
>This email (including all attachments) is intended solely for the named
>addressee. It is confidential and may contain commercially sensitive
>information. If you receive it in error, please let us know by reply email,
>delete it from your system and destroy any copies.
>
>This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced,
>adapted or transmitted without the prior written consent of the copyright
>owner.
>
>Emails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects
>and may not be successfully replicated on other systems. We give no
>warranties in relation to these matters. If you have any doubts about
>the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by us, please contact us
>immediately.
>
>**********************************************************************



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:54 GMT-3