From: Jason Sinclair (sinclairj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Mar 06 2002 - 03:50:08 GMT-3
Lionel,
Further to this, in the lab if they ask you to configure DLSW direct encaps
from ether to token ring you would need to use lite - correct?
Cheers,
Jason Sinclair
Manager, Network Support Group
POWERTEL
Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
SYDNEY NSW 2000
AUSTRALIA
office: + 61 2 8264 3820
mobile: + 61 416 105 858
* sinclairj@powertel.com.au
-----Original Message-----
From: Lionel Florit [mailto:lflorit@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 March 2002 15:31
To: Jason Sinclair
Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Re: DLSW issue
Jason,
DLSw direct will have DLSw encapsulated directly over frame
relay or
hdlc. It's only supported on token ring to token ring
connections. All
keep alive go through end to end. it's not a reliable
transport. Queuing is
also problem
DLSw Lite rides over LLC2 as you mentioned. It provides
reliable transport
and is not limited to token ring to token ring connections
(also supports
ethernet, SDLC, QLLC end systems)
configuration of both is very similar except you omit the
"pass-through"
keyword for DLSw lite.
Lionel
At 11:44 AM 3/6/2002 +1100, Jason Sinclair wrote:
>All,
>
>Can someone please explain what defines the difference
between DLSW Direct
>encaps and DLSW lite. I believe that DIRECT is where you
use DLSW as the
>transport and thus need pass-thru and the statement
frame-relay map dlsw
>dlci. Whereas with lite you use frame-map llc2 dlci and do
not use
>pass-thru. I am having problems with direct with pass-thru
and have raised a
>TAC case.
>
>Any ideas?
>
>Jason Sinclair
>Manager, Network Support Group
>POWERTEL
>Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
>SYDNEY NSW 2000
>AUSTRALIA
>office: + 61 2 8264 3820
>mobile: + 61 416 105 858
>* sinclairj@powertel.com.au
>
>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>PowerTel Limited, winners of
>Broadband Wholesale Carrier of the year, CommsWorld
Telecomms Awards 2001
>Best Emerging Telco, Australian Telecom Awards 2001
>
>**********************************************************************
>This email (including all attachments) is intended solely
for the named
>addressee. It is confidential and may contain commercially
sensitive
>information. If you receive it in error, please let us know
by reply email,
>delete it from your system and destroy any copies.
>
>This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it
should be reproduced,
>adapted or transmitted without the prior written consent of
the copyright
>owner.
>
>Emails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses
or other defects
>and may not be successfully replicated on other systems. We
give no
>warranties in relation to these matters. If you have any
doubts about
>the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by us, please
contact us
>immediately.
>
>**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:54 GMT-3