From: MADMAN (dmadlan@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 19:22:52 GMT-3
Not sure what your saying exactly but the physical interface is
multipoint period. Subinterfaces are what you configure them to be.
multipoint use maps, p-p use frame-relay interface-dlci or automgic for
either though I don;t recommend automagic.
Dave
> RSiddappa@NECBNS.com wrote:
>
> What I ment was for a Multi-point subinterface. ( that is u r logical
> interface).
> Think that u have configured couple of miltipoint subintefaces on one
> serail interface.
>
> R.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MADMAN [mailto:dmadlan@qwest.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:10 PM
> To: Siddappa, Rajeev
> Cc: neiby@ureach.com; jim.phillipo@guardent.com;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Frame map vs intfc DLCI
>
> It will happen automagically. If a sh frame map tells you the DLCI
> is
> dynamic it was learned via inverse arp
>
> Dave
>
> RSiddappa@NECBNS.com wrote:
> >
> > What do u do when they ask in the lab, do not use fram-relay map
> statement.
> > How ill u configure a DLCi for Multipoint interface. ( Do not need
> to worry
> > about physical, since DLCI will be assigned directly to the physical
>
> > interface)
> >
> > My 2 cents..
> >
> > R.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Neiberger [mailto:neiby@ureach.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:59 AM
> > To: jim.phillipo@guardent.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Frame map vs intfc DLCI
> >
> > It's very interesting that you mention this today. I'd never,
> > ever, seen anyone use the frame-relay interface-dlci command on
> > multipoint interfaces until last night when another list member
> > who shall remain nameless (Tim Ouellette) called me about this
> > exact issue.
> >
> > We had a hub router configured with a multipoint subinterface
> > using two frame-relay interface-dlci commands instead of frame
> > maps. At first I thought this wouldn't work at all but it did,
> > somewhat. The command reference says appears to say that it
> > ought to work in conjunction with inverse ARP.
> >
> > However, it didn't seem to be stable and behaved erratically.
> > When we removed those two statements and replaced them with two
> > frame maps things settled down quite nicely.
> >
> > Specifically, we were having issues with EIGRP. It seemed to
> > work, but the output of show ip eigrp neighbors indicated that
> > things might not be working as they ought to be. Sorry, I
> > don't have that info available here at work but if Tim reads
> > this might be able to post the exact results.
> >
> > I've always been under the impression that we only used the
> > frame-relay interface-dlci command on point-to-point
> > subinterfaces so I've always used frame maps in all other cases.
> >
> > What do you all think about this issue? Is there a time to use
> > one or the other on multipoint interfaces? Any gotchas we need
> > to look out for?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:30 GMT-3