From: EA Louie (elouie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 09 2002 - 20:26:48 GMT-3
...and if you do redist conn and want the actual subnets to be advertised,
you'll need to add the keyword 'subnets'.
It also helps to add a default-metric stmt on ALL RP's when you're
redistributing so that you don't get burned by the RP's that don't have a
default default-metric (such as IGRP and EIGRP).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Hill" <bhill@sgdata.com>
To: "Jeongwoo Park" <Jpark@wams.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: <scfeldberg@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:29 PM
Subject: RE: Redistribute ospf1-> ospf2->rip
> Not sure if you have Bruce Caslow's book but this exact problem is in one
of his spot the issues. Chapter 12 number 1.
>
> Here it is....
>
> A router is running RIP and OSPF. Both routing protocols are using
172.16.0.0 address space. The router also has twp 172.16.0.0 subnets
connected. RIP redistribution did not inject the routes into OSPF.
Redistribute connected injected them in. Why?
>
> Answer...
>
> Even though the two directly-connected subnets are defined as RIP subnets,
they are listed as connected subnets on the router. Therefore, redistribute
connected must be used to redistribute the routes into OSPF.
>
> HTH.
> -Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeongwoo Park [mailto:Jpark@wams.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:28 AM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Cc: 'scfeldberg@hotmail.com'
> Subject: Redistribute ospf1-> ospf2->rip
>
>
> Hi all
> Here is the scenario.
> Loopbacks
> R1(e0)-----------(e0)R2------172.16.1.1/28
> 172.16.1.17/28
> 172.16.1.33/28
> What I want to do is ultimately to redistribute these three loopback
> networks into rip.
> R2 is ASBR running ospf and rip. R1 is running only rip.
> As the people on this list recommended, I first created ospf 2 and
> redistributed ospf 1 into ospf 2. And during this redistribution from
ospf2
> to ospf1, I summarized three loopback networks to the classful address (
> 172.16.0.0/16) And I redistributed ospf 2 into rip.
> NOT WORKING
> Here is my config
> R2;
> !
> !
> !
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.240
> !
> interface Loopback2
> ip address 172.16.1.17 255.255.255.240
> !
> interface Loopback3
> ip address 172.16.1.33 255.255.255.240
> !
> router ospf 1
> log-adjacency-changes
> redistribute rip
> network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
> !
> router ospf 2
> log-adjacency-changes
> summary-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0
> redistribute ospf 1
> !
> router rip
> redistribute ospf 2
> network 192.168.1.0
> !
> ip route 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 Null0
> no ip http server
> !
> !
> line con 0
> password 7 120E0333
> login
> transport input none
> line vty 0 4
> exec-timeout 0 0
> password 7 xxxxxx
> login
> !
> end
>
> R1;
> version 12.1
> service timestamps debug uptime
> service timestamps log uptime
> no service password-encryption
> !
> hostname Router
> !
> enable secret 5 $1$ZMs8$bNzuexNNx77K24cGqgx6B0
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> !
> ip name-server 192.168.1.6
> no ip finger
> isdn switch-type basic-ni
> !
> !
> !
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 192.168.3.20 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 192.168.1.249 255.255.255.0
> !
> !
> router rip
> network 192.168.1.0
> network 192.168.3.0
> !
> ip http server
> ip classless
> !
> !
> line con 0
> password xxx
> transport input none
> stopbits 1
> line vty 0 4
> exec-timeout 0 0
> password xxx
> login
> !
> end
>
> R1's routing table;
> R1#sh ip route
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter
> area
> * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> P - periodic downloaded static route
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> C 192.168.3.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1
>
> As you can see, those three loopbacks didn't show up in this routing
table,
> which means it is not working.
>
> Can anyone point out what is wrong?
> I will appreciate your reply.
>
> JP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:22 GMT-3