From: tom cheung (tkc9789@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Dec 30 2001 - 02:26:08 GMT-3
With the BGP automatic-tag command, you can actually carry the igp's AS
number into BGP's origin code. The redistributed routes will reflect the
origin attribute of IGP, and the incomplete path you see here will be
changed to 'i'. This is explained in Doyle's volume II, page 260-261.
>From: "Scott Meeuwsen" <scott@meeuwsen.org>
>Reply-To: "Scott Meeuwsen" <scott@meeuwsen.org>
>To: "Michael Popovich" <m.popovich@home.com>, "CCIE GROUPSTUDY"
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: BGP Incomplete ?
>Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 23:39:54 -0500
>
>Yes, the ? denotes "Incomplete" which is the least preferred of the 3 BGP
>route origin types (IGP, EGP, Incomplete). You will see this anytime you
>do
>redistribution into BGP and will see an i (for IGP) anytime you use a
>network statement. I have never seen an EGP origin. My best guess is this
>was used for cross-communication with the old EGP routing protocol.
>
>--Scott
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Michael Popovich" <m.popovich@home.com>
>To: "CCIE GROUPSTUDY" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 9:20 PM
>Subject: BGP Incomplete ?
>
>
> > I am doing a lab where I have an AS200 that I am not advertising any
>internal
> > networks. I am redistributing EIGRP into BGP. This is the bgp table from
>an
> > EBGP neighbor in AS300.
> >
> > Is the reason for the "?" mark for the route path because it is a
> > redistributed route? This is my thinking on it.
> >
> > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> > *> 190.19.15.64/28 210.10.10.6 0 0 200 ?
> > *> 190.19.15.80/28 210.10.10.2 300288 0 200 ?
> > * 210.10.10.6 1312512 0 200 ?
> > *> 190.19.15.96/28 210.10.10.2 0 0 200 ?
> > * 210.10.10.6 1296384 0 200 ?
> > *> 192.19.15.0 210.10.10.2 1184512 0 200 ?
> > * 210.10.10.6 1696512 0 200 ?
> > *> 210.10.10.0/30 210.10.10.2 0 0 200 ?
> > * 210.10.10.6 1680384 0 200 ?
> > * 210.10.10.4/30 210.10.10.2 1680384 0 200 ?
> > *> 210.10.10.6 0 0 200 ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Michael
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:49 GMT-3