From: Jeongwoo Park (Jpark@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 27 2001 - 02:12:01 GMT-3
you are right.
It was no ip split-horizon eigrp <AS>
not "no ip split-horizon"
I was wrong.
Thanks for all your input.
Manny, you don't have to telnet to the lab. No Need for the hassle. :-)
thank you all.
JP
-----Original Message-----
From: Manny Gonzalez [mailto:manny@nyp.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:56 PM
To: Jeongwoo Park
Cc: 'albert_ccie@yahoo.com'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Eigrp secondary address not being advertised !!
Split Horizon huh?
Yup, he's right Jeongwoo. However, the command should have been:
no ip split-horizon eigrp [AS]
It will work once you do this. Please test it. Otherwise you will force
me to turn on the pc, telnet into the lab at work, plug it all in, and
see why or why not :-))
Jeongwoo Park wrote:
>
> The secondary ip addresses are still not being learned by the other router
> even after "no ip split-horizon"
>
> any other idea?
> Anyway thanks for the reply Albert.
>
> JP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Albert Lu [mailto:albert_ccie@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 7:39 PM
> To: 'Jeongwoo Park'
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Eigrp secondary address not being advertised !!
>
> A hint: "split horizon"
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Jeongwoo Park
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:20 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Eigrp secondary address not being advertised !!
>
> I have the following situation: On a 4500 (Router A) ethernet interface I
> have the following addresses:
> 172.18.114.1 secondary
> 172.18.115.1 secondary
> 172.18.116.1
> all masks are 24 bits
> On the ethernet segment another router (Router B) with address
172.18.116.50
> with mask 24 bits. Both are running EIGRP and the process number is the
> same. Problem: Router B has all networks from Router A except for those
> declared as secondary addresses. Why is this? How can I see all secondary
> addresses configured in Router A at Router B's routing table?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> JP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:48 GMT-3