From: Manny Gonzalez (manny@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 27 2001 - 02:54:57 GMT-3
:-)
Jeongwoo Park wrote:
>
> you are right.
> It was no ip split-horizon eigrp <AS>
> not "no ip split-horizon"
> I was wrong.
> Thanks for all your input.
> Manny, you don't have to telnet to the lab. No Need for the hassle. :-)
> thank you all.
> JP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manny Gonzalez [mailto:manny@nyp.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:56 PM
> To: Jeongwoo Park
> Cc: 'albert_ccie@yahoo.com'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Eigrp secondary address not being advertised !!
>
> Split Horizon huh?
>
> Yup, he's right Jeongwoo. However, the command should have been:
>
> no ip split-horizon eigrp [AS]
>
> It will work once you do this. Please test it. Otherwise you will force
> me to turn on the pc, telnet into the lab at work, plug it all in, and
> see why or why not :-))
>
> Jeongwoo Park wrote:
> >
> > The secondary ip addresses are still not being learned by the other router
> > even after "no ip split-horizon"
> >
> > any other idea?
> > Anyway thanks for the reply Albert.
> >
> > JP
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Albert Lu [mailto:albert_ccie@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 7:39 PM
> > To: 'Jeongwoo Park'
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: Eigrp secondary address not being advertised !!
> >
> > A hint: "split horizon"
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Jeongwoo Park
> > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:20 PM
> > To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Subject: Eigrp secondary address not being advertised !!
> >
> > I have the following situation: On a 4500 (Router A) ethernet interface I
> > have the following addresses:
> > 172.18.114.1 secondary
> > 172.18.115.1 secondary
> > 172.18.116.1
> > all masks are 24 bits
> > On the ethernet segment another router (Router B) with address
> 172.18.116.50
> > with mask 24 bits. Both are running EIGRP and the process number is the
> > same. Problem: Router B has all networks from Router A except for those
> > declared as secondary addresses. Why is this? How can I see all secondary
> > addresses configured in Router A at Router B's routing table?
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > JP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:48 GMT-3