Opinions on static routes defined.

From: DAN DORTON (DHSTS68@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 13 2001 - 12:35:30 GMT-3


   
In some of my practice labs I have of course seen the phrase do not use
any statics to accomplish goals in this lab unless specifically
specified to do so.

In some of these instances the only way to make some of it work is to
either use the IP DEFAULT-NETWORK command ( Which of course creates a
static route, or use the DEFAULT-INFORMATION ORIGINATE ( Which is also
sort of a static injected type route.).

In my mind these commands both fall in the category of statics, but
then in some instance I see no other way. ( Also some of the instances
could be fixed with protocol redistribution, but this is explicitly
denied as well. )

I am just curious about how everyone else feels on this subject.

Please no breaking the NDA as this is not my intent of the question. I
am only wanting personal feeling responses.

Thanks,
Dan



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:43 GMT-3