From: John Neiberger (neiby@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Nov 24 2001 - 21:42:52 GMT-3
If your configs are working, R1 should be able to ping the ethernet
interface on R4 and vice versa.
Regards,
John
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001 16:18:56 -0800 (PST), Rajeev Siddappa wrote:
| Hi John,
|
| I am trying to simulate the same cofigs but I am not
| sure how do I verify that by SRT is working fine.
|
| Pls mail me the details.
|
| Thnaks,
| Rajeev.
|
|
| --- John Neiberger <neiby@excite.com> wrote:
| > Sure, no problem. The working config is quite a bit
| > simpler than what I was
| > trying before. R2 is handling the translation, and
| > here are the relevant
| > portions of its config:
| >
| > no ip routing
| > !
| > interface Serial0
| > no ip address
| > no ip route-cache
| > no ip mroute-cache
| > no fair-queue
| > clockrate 64000
| > bridge-group 20
| > !
| > interface TokenRing0
| > no ip address
| > no ip route-cache
| > no ip mroute-cache
| > ring-speed 16
| > bridge-group 20
| > !
| > !
| > bridge 20 protocol ieee
| > bridge 20 bitswap-layer3-addresses
| >
| > It was that last statement that I neglected to add
| > when I first tried this.
| > The same result should be possible with SR/TLB, but
| > I wasn't able to make it
| > work correctly. I'll have to play around and see
| > what I can come up with.
| >
| > The tricky portion of this is that on R2 and R3, ip
| > routing is turned off.
| > I suppose I could still use RSRB on R2 and R3 since
| > they're directly
| > connected. In fact, that's probably the way to go
| > if the token ring segment
| > is using SRB.
| >
| > Regards,
| > John
| >
| > On Sat, 24 Nov 2001 07:33:35 -1000, Wayne Lewis
| > wrote:
| >
| > |
| > | John,
| > |
| > | Can you post your 'successful' configs?
| > |
| > | Aloha,
| > |
| > | Wayne
| > |
| > |
| > | -----Original Message-----
| > | From: nobody@groupstudy.com
| > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
| > | John Neiberger
| > | Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 7:08 AM
| > | To: fwells12; ccielab@groupstudy.com
| > | Subject: Solved Re: Transparent Bridging IP from
| > TR to ETH over Serial
| > |
| > |
| > | Okay, nevermind. I went back to the beginning
| > and configured SRT instead
| > | just like I did in the first place. I realized
| > that I did not have
| > | 'bitswap-layer3-addresses' in the config the
| > first time I tried it. I
| > | assumed I was doing something wrong and tried to
| > do this using SR/TLB
| > which
| > | was a bad move.
| > |
| > | Simply erasing all SRB-related configs and adding
| > a bridge-group line to
| > the
| > | token ring interface works great. I just wasn't
| > paying enough attention
| > the
| > | first time I tried it.
| > |
| > | Live and learn. :-) This is *exactly* why I was
| > practicing bridging in
| > the
| > | first place!
| > |
| > | Thanks,
| > | John
| > |
| > | On Sat, 24 Nov 2001 08:55:12 -0800 (PST), John
| > Neiberger wrote:
| > |
| > | | Okay,here is the config of R2. R1 and R4
| > simply have IP addresses
| > | assigned,
| > | | and R3 is transparent bridging from serial to
| > ethernet.
| > | |
| > | | no ip routing
| > | | !
| > | | source-bridge ring-group 200
| > | | source-bridge transparent 200 300 1 20
| > | | !
| > | | interface Serial0
| > | | no ip address
| > | | no ip route-cache
| > | | no ip mroute-cache
| > | | no fair-queue
| > | | clockrate 64000
| > | | bridge-group 20
| > | |
| > | | interface TokenRing0
| > | | no ip address
| > | | no ip route-cache
| > | | no ip mroute-cache
| > | | ring-speed 16
| > | | source-bridge 10 1 200
| > | | !
| > | | bridge 20 protocol ieee
| > | | bridge 20 bitswap-layer3-addresses
| > | |
| > | | This is the current config but I've tried
| > other configs to no avail.
| > | After
| > | | I get some coffee I'm going to try to think
| > this through again. I
| > have a
| > | | feeling there is a problem with my thought
| > process and I'll have to be
| > | awake
| > | | to spot it. :-)
| > | |
| > | | Thanks,
| > | | John
| > | |
| > | | On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 22:07:56 -0800, fwells12
| > wrote:
| > | |
| > | | | Show us your configs...
| > | | |
| > | | | ----- Original Message -----
| > | | | From: "John Neiberger" <neiby@excite.com>
| > | | | To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
| > | | | Cc: <elouie@yahoo.com>
| > | | | Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 9:43 PM
| > | | | Subject: Transparent Bridging IP from TR to
| > ETH over Serial
| > | | |
| > | | |
| > | | | > I'm having trouble configuring this and
| > it seem that there ought
| > to
| > | be
| > | | a
| > | | | way
| > | | | > to do this. Here is the scenario:
| > | | | >
| > | | | > R1----(t/r)-----R2---(serial)---R3
| > ----(eth)---- R4
| > | | | >
| > | | | > IP routing is turned off on R2 and R3.
| > I'm attempting to
| > | transparently
| > | | | > bridge IP from the t/r segment to the
| > ethernet segment and I'm
| > | failing
| > | | | > miserably.
| > | | | >
| > | | | > I've tried a few different things with no
| > success. At the moment
| > | I'm
| > | | | > playing with SR/TLB on R2, but usually
| > that involves T/R to Eth
| > | | conversion
| > | | | > on the same router, right? In this case
| > it's T/R to serial and
| > this
| > | | isn't
| > | | | > working so far.
| > | | | >
| > | | | > If I wasn't trying to bridge IP I could
| > use DLSw, but I don't see
| > | how I
| > | | | > could use that here.
| > | | | >
| > | | | > I should mention that this isn't part of
| > a lab scenario, I just
| > | wanted
| > | | to
| > | | | > see if I could do it.
| > | | | >
| > | | | > Any thoughts? I think I'm going to give
| > up for the evening and
| > try
| > | | again
| >
| === message truncated ===
|
|
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:22 GMT-3