From: John Neiberger (neiby@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Nov 24 2001 - 14:08:20 GMT-3
Okay, nevermind. I went back to the beginning and configured SRT instead
just like I did in the first place. I realized that I did not have
'bitswap-layer3-addresses' in the config the first time I tried it. I
assumed I was doing something wrong and tried to do this using SR/TLB which
was a bad move.
Simply erasing all SRB-related configs and adding a bridge-group line to the
token ring interface works great. I just wasn't paying enough attention the
first time I tried it.
Live and learn. :-) This is *exactly* why I was practicing bridging in the
first place!
Thanks,
John
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001 08:55:12 -0800 (PST), John Neiberger wrote:
| Okay,here is the config of R2. R1 and R4 simply have IP addresses
assigned,
| and R3 is transparent bridging from serial to ethernet.
|
| no ip routing
| !
| source-bridge ring-group 200
| source-bridge transparent 200 300 1 20
| !
| interface Serial0
| no ip address
| no ip route-cache
| no ip mroute-cache
| no fair-queue
| clockrate 64000
| bridge-group 20
|
| interface TokenRing0
| no ip address
| no ip route-cache
| no ip mroute-cache
| ring-speed 16
| source-bridge 10 1 200
| !
| bridge 20 protocol ieee
| bridge 20 bitswap-layer3-addresses
|
| This is the current config but I've tried other configs to no avail.
After
| I get some coffee I'm going to try to think this through again. I have a
| feeling there is a problem with my thought process and I'll have to be
awake
| to spot it. :-)
|
| Thanks,
| John
|
| On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 22:07:56 -0800, fwells12 wrote:
|
| | Show us your configs...
| |
| | ----- Original Message -----
| | From: "John Neiberger" <neiby@excite.com>
| | To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
| | Cc: <elouie@yahoo.com>
| | Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 9:43 PM
| | Subject: Transparent Bridging IP from TR to ETH over Serial
| |
| |
| | > I'm having trouble configuring this and it seem that there ought to
be
| a
| | way
| | > to do this. Here is the scenario:
| | >
| | > R1----(t/r)-----R2---(serial)---R3 ----(eth)---- R4
| | >
| | > IP routing is turned off on R2 and R3. I'm attempting to
transparently
| | > bridge IP from the t/r segment to the ethernet segment and I'm
failing
| | > miserably.
| | >
| | > I've tried a few different things with no success. At the moment
I'm
| | > playing with SR/TLB on R2, but usually that involves T/R to Eth
| conversion
| | > on the same router, right? In this case it's T/R to serial and this
| isn't
| | > working so far.
| | >
| | > If I wasn't trying to bridge IP I could use DLSw, but I don't see
how I
| | > could use that here.
| | >
| | > I should mention that this isn't part of a lab scenario, I just
wanted
| to
| | > see if I could do it.
| | >
| | > Any thoughts? I think I'm going to give up for the evening and try
| again
| | > tomorrow when I can actually think clearly. <g>
| | >
| | > Thanks,
| | > John
| | >
| | >
| | >
| | >
| | >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:22 GMT-3