From: JffryH\(Yahoo\) (jffryh@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Nov 23 2001 - 23:55:35 GMT-3
Hi,
See if following solve your problem.
Note that Inaccessible does not necessary says that is inaccessible. It mean t
he topology has path to that route but because of AD, the EIGRP route is not pu
t into route table. When the lower AD routes removed, this EIGRP route will bac
k and become accessible and show correct FD again.
Route can become Inaccessible when lower AD route installed in route table, eit
her by other protocol or static route.
CCIE Study Professional Checklist
http://www.geocities.com/berdde/
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of xujing@3
1942.org
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 10:48 PM
To: ccielab
Subject: From XuJing
Hi, ccielab#!
I setup a network for my customer. There are two kind of routing protocol in th
e whole network : EIGRP & OSPF. I want to let the ospf become the primary routi
ng protocol and let these two kind of protocol be able to redistribute each oth
er. I can see almost all the route in ASBR controlled by ospf ( so, the route i
s: O/O IA/O E2). But when I show the eigrp topology database, I find lots of ro
ute become inaccessible & "0 successors". Just like following:
P 1.1.10.0/24, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible
via 1.1.8.2 (768000/512000), FastEthernet0/0
I show the routing table from all the router, I think it's no problem. My custo
mer ask me why the eigrp topology is abnormal and all the routing table is righ
t. I can not give him a answer. So who can tell me why?
Thanks a lot !!!
Best Regards!!!
XuJing
xujing@e-ccsi.org
2001-11-23
**********************
CCSI:21130
CCNP/CCDP/CNE4/CLP
**********************
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of FOX
.GIF]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:22 GMT-3