From: Mas Kato (loomis_towcar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Nov 24 2001 - 05:53:24 GMT-3
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
I wonder if it's a cosmetic error. The total cost to the destination is known t
o be 768000, so it's weird that it isn't listed as the feasible distance (FD).
After hours, you might want to try using 'debug eigrp fsm' and then clear the E
IGRP neighbor to see how the FDs look as DUAL runs.
Regards,
Mas Kato
https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> xujing@31942.orgDate: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 22:48:23 +0800
> ccielab <ccielab@groupstudy.com> From XuJingReply-To: xujing@31942.org
>
>Hi, ccielab#!
>
>I setup a network for my customer. There are two kind of routing protocol in t
he whole network : EIGRP & OSPF. I want to let the ospf become the primary rout
ing protocol and let these two kind of protocol be able to redistribute each ot
her. I can see almost all the route in ASBR controlled by ospf ( so, the route
is: O/O IA/O E2). But when I show the eigrp topology database, I find lots of r
oute become inaccessible & "0 successors". Just like following:
>
>P 1.1.10.0/24, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible
> via 1.1.8.2 (768000/512000), FastEthernet0/0
>
>I show the routing table from all the router, I think it's no problem. My cust
omer ask me why the eigrp topology is abnormal and all the routing table is rig
ht. I can not give him a answer. So who can tell me why?
>
>Thanks a lot !!!
>
>
>
>Best Regards!!!
>XuJing
>xujing@e-ccsi.org
>2001-11-23
>
>**********************
>CCSI:21130
>CCNP/CCDP/CNE4/CLP
>**********************
>
>[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of FO
X.GIF]
------------------------------------------------------------
Speed Racer's Official Virtual Pit Stop.
http://www.speedracerdsl.com/speedracer/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:22 GMT-3