From: Ademola Osindero (ademolaosindero@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Sep 04 2001 - 07:34:46 GMT-3
But do you reallly need multiring all?
--- "Cox, Bryan" <bryan.cox@avistacorp.com> wrote:
> Neil,
>
> I mocked up the config in my lab--I had to do the
> following. I defined
> everything just as you had on the 3920 except that I
> made sure the ring #s
> on the two CRFs were different. (The 3920 wouldn't
> allow them to be the
> same anyway.) The CRF adjacent to R1 below had a
> ring # 20 assigned to it.
> The CRF adjacent to r4 had ring # 21 assigned to it.
> The pertinent portion
> of the configs follows:
>
>
> Here was my topology:
>
> r1--3920--r4
>
> R1's config:
>
> interface TokenRing0/0
> ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
> ring-speed 16
> multiring ip
>
> R4's config:
>
> interface TokenRing0/0
> ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
> ring-speed 16
> multiring ip
>
> Anyway with hard coded ring #s and setting the TrBRF
> in SRB mode this worked
> fine.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bryan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Garcia Legada [mailto:nlegs@visto.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 8:04 PM
> To: kgalusha@cisco.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com;
> jkesemey@bellsouth.net
> Subject: RE: 3920 Token Ring Switch Question
>
>
> Hi Kyle,
>
> I also tried that same config that you have below.
> Still didnt work.
>
> I would greatly appreciate it if you could give some
> feedback when you
> tested the same setup as mine in your lab. I only
> rented an online rack to
> play around with 3920.
>
>
> Thanks very much.
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyle Galusha kgalusha@cisco.com
> Sent: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 11:30:02 -0500
> To: nlegs@visto.com
> Subject: RE: 3920 Token Ring Switch Question
>
>
> did you try assigning a ring number to the 3900
> instead of using auto
> mode? Do the router show a ring number? I know
> I've seen mismatches
> when the ring numbers where different., But that was
> when I had srb also
> configed on the router interface like this
> source-bridge ring-group 100
> Inter to0
> source-route 5 1 100
> If the 3900 is attached to to0 it should see ring 5
> I believe. I'll try it
> in the lab later today.
> Kyle
>
> At 03:15 AM 9/2/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> >Hi Andy,
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >I tried that one but it didnt work.
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Neil
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: andrew.waldwyn@bt.com
> >Sent: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 09:51:04 +0100
> >To: nlegs@visto.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: 3920 Token Ring Switch Question
> >
> >
> >Neil,
> >
> >Try "multiring ip" under your token ring
> interfaces.
> >The problem is that the router is sending the IP
> packets without RIF. As
> the
> >catalyst is configured to do SRB between both VLANs
> it will drop all the
> >frames that don't carry the RIF.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Andy
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Neil Garcia Legada [mailto:nlegs@visto.com]
> >Sent: 02 September 2001 06:58
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: 3920 Token Ring Switch Question
> >
> >
> >Hello Group,
> >
> >Below are my configurations on cat3920. Routers are
> attached using ports as
> >per the CDP info. TrBRF's were defined with
> corresponding TrCRF's under it.
> >Ports are then assigned to TrCRF's accordingly.
> >
> >When SRB bridging mode is used on TrCRF's, why is
> it that ping from r3 to
> r8
> >is unsuccessful ??? But when I changed the bridging
> mode to SRT I was able
> >to ping r8 from r3. Is there a way to make it work
> using SRB on TrCRF's ???
> >I'm kind of confuse about those bridging mode.
> >
> >Appreciate any feedback.
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Neil
> >
> >
> >*******
> >
> > VTP VLAN Configuration
> >
> > TrBRF/TrCRF ID
> Brdg/Rng Ports Local
> >State
> > TrBRF100 100
> 0x01
> >preferred
> > TrCRF10 10
> auto yes
> >preferred
> > TrCRF11 11
> auto yes
> >preferred
> > TrBRF200 200
> 0x01
> >preferred
> > TrCRF20 20
> auto yes
> >preferred
> > trbrf-default 1005
> 0x0F
> >preferred
> > trcrf-default 1003
> 0xCCC yes
> >preferred
> >
> >
> > Local VLAN Port
> Configuration
> >
> >Port Mode TrCRF
> TrBRF
> > 3 Static TrCRF10
> TrBRF100
> > 8 Static TrCRF11
> TrBRF100
> > 13 Static TrCRF20
> TrBRF200
> >
> >
> > CDP Neighbor Display
> >
>
=== message truncated ===
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:14 GMT-3