From: CiscoJunkie (ciscojunkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Sep 04 2001 - 10:35:17 GMT-3
Here is the one I got from Stonewall Cable - PN SC-9780
http://www.stonewallcable.com//product.asp?dept%5Fid=100&pf%5Fid=SC%2D9780
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Christopher Supino
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 10:15 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Part Number
OT:
Anyone know the part number for a 50 pin serial to 60 pin serial X-over
cable? (Cisco 4000 to Cisco 2500)
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Erick B.
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:40 PM
To: kenairs; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OSPF message
You'll see this w/12.1T and above if you're
redistributing a connected network into OSPF that is
already natively part of OSPF. With 12.1 mainline and
below IOS will redistribute the network into OSPF
externally even though it is already part of OSPF. I
posted a summary of my findings on this a few days
ago.
There may be other reasons why it occurs as well but I
can't think of any at moment.
--- kenairs <kenairs@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi ,
> I was doing some debug on OSPF and came across this
> below.
> "
> OSPF: Start redist-scanning
> 01:33:18: OSPF: Scan for both redistribution and
> translation
> 01:33:18: OSPF: max-aged external LSA for summary
> 170.150.23.0 255.255.255.0
> 01:33:18: OSPF: End scanning, Elapsed time 8ms
> "
>
> Any one can explain this ?
> Tks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:14 GMT-3