From: Bryan Long \(Richmond VA\) (bryaninrichmond@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Aug 31 2001 - 01:55:33 GMT-3
Jon,
If I was to go with the 516-CS for instance. Would I be losing any
functionality or knowledge about the terminal server setup/ios that I would
need for the Lab? I guess in other words, not having worked with a 2509 or
2511 won't put me at any disadvantage will it?
Thanks for your advice!
Bryan - (too much alphabet soup to list)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Carmichael" <jonc@pacbell.net>
To: "Bryan Long (Richmond VA)" <bryaninrichmond@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:01 AM
Subject: RE: 500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511
> I like it better than the 2509, --does not require an octopus cable, --I
cut
> up some console cables that are six feet long and made little
> ones, --reterminate them with a RJ45 crimp, --and you can have 12 inch or
24
> inch or whatever cables. Mine works great.
>
> JONC
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Bryan Long (Richmond VA)
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:18 PM
> To: Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com
> Subject: 500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511
>
>
> Has anyone used the 500 CS as their terminal server as opposed to the 2509
> or
> 2511? Or if anyone has advice that would be great.
>
>
> Thanks!!
>
>
> Bryan
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:01 GMT-3